Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/17/2016 5:49:47 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MarvinStinson

Just check out what they have trending on Facebook. It’s always liberal. A lot of times a story that you would not think is trending but maybe one facebook is trying to get you to read... Just take a look.


2 posted on 04/17/2016 5:54:57 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Apple; SunkenCiv; stephenjohnbanker; Albion Wilde; Arthur Wildfire! March

bmp


4 posted on 04/17/2016 6:08:43 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

If you have a FB page please post this article to it.


5 posted on 04/17/2016 6:09:43 AM PDT by Fai Mao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

GOOGLE THIS

And surprisingly, for the last month, Donald Trump is in the top stories list for GOOGLE NEWS.

While searching GOOGLE NEWS for “Ted Cruz” would only come up with NEGATIVE results; unlike BING or YAHOO, which gave neutral “Ted Cruz” search results all month.

Gee, I really thought GOOGLE was strictly honest search algorithms. It certainly is a powerful company!

Golly Gee Google!


6 posted on 04/17/2016 6:14:25 AM PDT by foldspace (Barak and Hillary are still not >convicted< criminals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Yep, far left lefties - here’s proof - Using a site search on google, look at how well Sanders does over Clinton!

site:www.facebook.com “sanders 2016” = 295,000 results

site:www.facebook.com “trump 2016” = 165,000

site:www.facebook.com “cruz 2016” = 42,000

site:www.facebook.com “clinton 2016” = 22,800

and just to be sure ...

site:www.facebook.com “hillary 2016” = 26,300

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&newwindow=1&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US%3AIE-Address&biw=1304&bih=690&q=site%3Awww.facebook.com+%22sanders+2016%22&oq=site%3Awww.facebook.com+%22sanders+2016%22


7 posted on 04/17/2016 6:16:05 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

I’ve seen twitter do this. They flagged a picture Sheriff Joe tweeted as “sensitive material”. It was Joe in a red Thunderbird convertible in a parade.


10 posted on 04/17/2016 6:24:44 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
More disturbing to me is the willingness so many friends and family have to more or less completely give over their headspace to this illusion.

I have family members with whom I cannot communicate unless it is through this claustrophobic Facebook universe, as though, for them, it had become the Internet by itself.

AOL completely failed at their attempt to accomplish this 20 years ago, and FB will ultimately fail as more eventually understand their business model, where users and advertisers both have to pay for an audience. How few users know when they "post" something, only a small group of their "followers" even see what they've put up.

It's a huge con. And the sanctimonious attitude of Zuckerberg's company culture is revolting.

12 posted on 04/17/2016 6:31:33 AM PDT by Prospero (Omnis caro fenum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

50,000 angry islamist men could take Mark’s wall down, easy


13 posted on 04/17/2016 6:42:24 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson; Admin Moderator

How is this different than Free Republic censoring posters? If Facebook is privately-owned they get to make their rules, just like this place gets to make its rules. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

Right, moderator?


14 posted on 04/17/2016 6:48:06 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Nothing wrong with that unless FB is guided by a covert agency. In that case, we have the tail wagging the dog.


15 posted on 04/17/2016 6:48:06 AM PDT by notacentfortribute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson
firstly....legally, any action, or omission by a FB employee is clearly a sanctioned action by FB administration....so stop with the "employee" crap, as used by the liberal media....
17 posted on 04/17/2016 7:12:18 AM PDT by B212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Zuckerberg/facebook is slowly disabling accounts of anyone who speaks out against Obama, Rapefugees, Islam, or Saudi Arabia on Facebook. every month they block a group of accounts and cannot give you a reason for the block. they are requesting government id to open the account back-up. so they can Confirm Your Identity. pretty much anyone that if not a Liberal or Leftist. Google government+id+facebook+disabled+account


18 posted on 04/17/2016 7:58:11 AM PDT by StCloudMoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

All they are doing is losing their own reputation. Once they deceive, they’re never trusted again.


19 posted on 04/17/2016 12:54:26 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson