Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
Correct. It only reflects how those particular states will proceed from this point forward, unless reversed on appeal.

We get that some states and some courts are cuckoo for coco-puffs, so why do you keep pointing out what kooky courts do?

Their deliberations have no merit. Neither do their conclusions. They have power, but they do not have the correct answers.

157 posted on 04/19/2016 11:26:19 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Just because some idiot posting on the internet thinks that court rulings have no merit doesn’t make it so.
Article 3 of the Constitution clearly states that “judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;—between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.”

The Courts get to resolve ALL “cases and controversies” arising under the Constitution.
If you don’t like it, move somewhere else.


160 posted on 04/19/2016 11:43:18 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson