Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz claims he's won 'landslides over and over' – even though only one of them held an election
Daily Mail UK ^ | April 18, 2016 | David Martosko

Posted on 04/18/2016 7:58:43 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

Ted Cruz boasted Monday morning that he has won 'landslides' in the last five states to award Republican convention delegates, even though only one of those states held a popular-vote election.

'There have been a total of five states that have voted in the last three weeks,' he claimed during a town hall event on 'Good Morning America.'

'In those states, starting with Utah, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Colorado and Wyoming, 1.3 million people voted in those states. And he lost all five. We have won five in a row, and Donald's upset so he's throwing a fit.'

Cruz reiterated moments later that in 'five states in a row, we've won landslides over and over and over again.'

Ted Cruz boasted Monday morning that he has won 'landslides' in the last five states to award Republican convention delegates, even though only one of those states held a popular-vote election.

'There have been a total of five states that have voted in the last three weeks,' he claimed during a town hall event on 'Good Morning America.'

'In those states, starting with Utah, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Colorado and Wyoming, 1.3 million people voted in those states. And he lost all five. We have won five in a row, and Donald's upset so he's throwing a fit.'

Cruz reiterated moments later that in 'five states in a row, we've won landslides over and over and over again.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 1losercruz; 1losertrump; 2016denyvoters; 2016election; 2016electionfraud; 2016voterfraud; boastercruz; brianwilliamsofgop; creepycruz; creepycruzers; cruslims; cruz; dumpcruz; dumpdonald; dumptrump; election2016; insiders4cruz; itsnotfair; liarcruz; liars4cruz; liarted; liartrump; losercruz; losertrump; losewithcruz; lyingted; lyinted; nastycruzers; rump; saboteurcruz; spoilercruz; stted; tedcruz; tedlyingagain; texas; trumpanzees; trumpcult; trumpdisease; voters4trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-247 next last
To: Daniel Ramsey

What needs to be done is for Cruz and whatsisface...you know...the third guy...to get behind the Obiwan.


121 posted on 04/18/2016 10:31:48 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

>>>”1.3 million people voted in those states”

So, “voterless” is an obvious lie.


122 posted on 04/18/2016 10:33:44 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

The best explanation I’ve seen on Kennedy’s death is that it was an accident.

The first two bullets that hit Kennedy in the back were full metal jacket. The FMJ bullet found was consistent with Oswald’s rifle.

The bullet that hit Kennedy in the head was a fragmentation round, not FMJ. It broke into multiple pieces. The entry hole was a different size than Oswald’s rifle. The fragmentation bullet could not have been fired by Oswald’s rifle.

Those are known facts. The bullet evidence by itself is enough to eliminate Oswald as the lone shooter.

Who was carrying weapons loaded with fragmentation rounds in the correct caliber to make the hole in Kennedy’s head? The secret service agents riding in the car following Kennedy.

IMHO, the most likely scenario is: Oswald starting firing; upon hearing the gunfire a secret service agent in the trailing car pulled his weapon, he had a negligent discharge, and the bullet from that discharge struck the president.

A lot of the after the fact stuff (Oswald’s murder; the commission’s lone gunman conclusion) make sense under this scenario. To tell the public that a government agent (even just by accident) shot the president would have been chaos. Hence, it was covered up.

Now, who put Oswald up to it is a different question.


123 posted on 04/18/2016 10:33:58 AM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Defiant; Daniel Ramsey

Yup, they use Alinsky tactics to make you think you are outnumbered.

In the FR caucus polls, the ratio of Trump supporters to Cruz supporters is around 3:1, last I heard. We ARE the majority.


124 posted on 04/18/2016 10:34:38 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

From Conservative Treehouse

In every poll Donald Trump wins the “he-is-who-he-is” factor.

As Lee Atwater would tell you, that’s critically important. Once the broader electorate sense “who you are”, and become comfortable with that sensibility, there is a remarkable shift toward granting the benefit of doubt in policy and change.

[The most recent example of such a benefactor was Bill Clinton in his prime.]

However, in the same polls, Ted Cruz is viewed as the candidate willing to tell you everything you want to hear so long as it benefits him. That’s the “authenticity” issue. Just as there is a long-term benefit in positive authenticity polling, there is a long-term detriment in negative authenticity polling.

Opinions of “authenticity” are almost impossible to change once they embed. The word ‘almost’ is an understatement, because no politician in modern times has ever been able to reverse the authenticity component.

Bernie Sanders also benefits from positive opinions in authenticity, and Hillary Clinton is viewed similarly to Cruz as inherently inauthentic as a matter of mere disposition.


125 posted on 04/18/2016 10:37:03 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Cruz’ bid for the GOP nomination has the support of 90% of people who want to see Hillary Clinton in the White House.


126 posted on 04/18/2016 10:40:07 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

The only state people got to vote in was WI, 1.1 million, so there’s only 200,000 in those 4 other states?


127 posted on 04/18/2016 10:41:00 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

it’s amazing how few people it takes to give the impression of being a majority if they’re loud enough


128 posted on 04/18/2016 10:41:28 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

So, “voterless” is an obvious lie.


129 posted on 04/18/2016 10:41:37 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: C210N

A couple of things. First, this is from Dead State. I hate to go there, but I did. Second, Trump is leading in CA, this guy has Cruz winning 152 delegates to Trump’s 30. That ain’t gonna happen. I could see a more even split of the votes like what happened in MO. The author strikes me as a die hard sports fan who lets his love for a team get in the way of reality while making a bet. He would be the guy that would pick New Mexico State to win the national title because he went there.


130 posted on 04/18/2016 10:43:16 AM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: heights
He can take his Back Room, Party Boss ‘Victories’ and shove um up his big fat flabby white butt.

What you said.

131 posted on 04/18/2016 10:47:29 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
I think the establishment and the Cruzers and their bought-and-paid-for "conservative" media are all pretending that the 1000 pound elephant isn't in the room: and that is, bribery. Cruz won these last "five landslides" the old fashioned way, by bribing. Corrupt Boss Hoggs, and I think the Elite 1% underestimate the intuitive way that everyone knows this is what's going on.

I have not seen it reported that this is exactly what Trump said twice yesterday, at two different appearances: he said bribery was wrong and he was not going to go there and play that game. (I posted an FR thread on it.)

But the "conservative" media and MSM continue to say, "the Cruz ground game", and other euphemisms for one thing: corruption. (WHICH by the way according to govt regulations for political party primaries, is LEGAL---it's legal to bribe delegates as long as it's an individual donor, as opposed to a union, corporation, etc. Cruz is playing the game as it's always been played; problem is he poses as being "moral" and Christian, etc.)

132 posted on 04/18/2016 10:49:08 AM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/02/kristol-lays-strategy-give-white-house-hillary-trump-shouldnt-win/

Kristol Lays Out Strategy to Give White House to Hillary: Trump ‘Shouldn’t Win’


133 posted on 04/18/2016 10:49:12 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Cruz did win the delegates...and they are who will vote at convention.....so yes he did win...... Besides The Don wouldn't be squealing like a stuck pig that the game was rigged unless he knows all to well himself that he lost...... I don't recall Trump complaining about "the rules" when he won all 99 FL. delegates with only 45% of the vote...thus his squealing always indicates he knows he lost.


134 posted on 04/18/2016 11:00:37 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
Trump is leading in CA, this guy has Cruz winning 152 delegates to Trump’s 30. That ain’t gonna happen.

Well, I agree with that... it was buried in tiny print in a jpg, good catch.

135 posted on 04/18/2016 11:03:12 AM PDT by C210N (Supporting the Constitutional Conservative in the race. Constitutional Conservative Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
It 'IS' a big deal if this goes to convention..which most everyone believes it will including Trump..... The ONLY way that won't happen is if Trump can somehow attain the required 1,237 number.....and just for clarification....It's not the 'most' delegates, it's the 'Majority' ..... 1100 does not = 1,237 required to win the nominee before the convention.


136 posted on 04/18/2016 11:06:07 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Cute cartoon. He annoyed some umpires and the tennis establishment.

Did he usually lose or win?

John Patrick McEnroe, Jr. (born February 16, 1959) is an American former World No. 1 professional tennis player, often rated among the greatest of all time in the sport, especially for his touch on the volley.[a] He won seven Grand Slam singles titles (three at Wimbledon and four at the US Open), nine Grand Slam men’s doubles titles, and one Grand Slam mixed doubles title. He also won a record eight year-end championships, 19 Grand Prix Super Series titles, and finished his career with 77 ATP-listed singles titles and 78 in doubles.

McEnroe is known for his shot-making artistry and volleying skills; for his rivalries with Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Ivan Lendl; and for his confrontational on-court behavior, which frequently landed him in trouble with umpires and tennis authorities.


137 posted on 04/18/2016 11:09:16 AM PDT by ChuteTheMall (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: C210N
It's been stunning watching Cruz position himself in this race without media nor Breitbart, nor Hannity and others...It's been like watching someone swim up Niagara with a dead body strapped at his waist and Cruz will be the first Republican President that had to run against two democrats before taking office....Trump & Hillary!


138 posted on 04/18/2016 11:10:48 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

....”I don’t think it really is a democracy any more”....

We’re not, never were...we’re a “Republic”...It’s to the “Republic” for which we stand.


139 posted on 04/18/2016 11:14:03 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: caww

VOTE, not ASSIGN.


140 posted on 04/18/2016 11:14:59 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson