Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong

RE: He lies with a straight face about a number of issues. His stance on illegal immigration is really non existent because he really is not against illegal immigration.

If so, why did Jeff Sessions say this:

Jeff Sessions: Without Ted Cruz, Amnesty Would Have Passed In 2013

See here:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/12/20/jeff_sessions_without_ted_cruz_amnesty_would_have_passed_in_2013.html

RE: He runs around using rules to garner delegates because he cannot win voter support.

I don;t know why this is a knock against him. If those are the rules and he works within the rules and the rules have been made known way in advance, what exactly did he do wrong?

If he broke the rules I can understand, but he did not. Heck even Rush Limbaugh, the conservative people in FR defer to most of the time says that Cruz is not cheating.

If you don’t like the GOP rules, I see the following things you can do:

1) Work to Change the rules ( but do it before the primaries, not after it has already began )

or

2) Form your own party.

But why knock Ted Cruz and call him a cheater when all he’s doing is familiarizing himself with the primary process and working to garner the necessary delegates to win?

RE: He shows all of the signs of a petty person who is more willing to wrought destruction out of spite when he realizes he has lost.

Listen, if you are going to call him petty for fighting to win, then I have to disagree with you. The main rule is this -— YOU HAVE TO GARNER 1,237 DELEGATES TO WIN THE NOMINATION. If you don’t it goes to the convention floor and if you win in the first ballot, you are the nominee. If you still do not win, it goes to subsequent ballots until a final nominee is chosen.

If Trump wins 1,237, heck, I’ll support him over Hillary but not until. In the meantime, all these talk about Cruz cheating because he is not giving up at this time is BUNK.

The GOP has been doing this since the time of Abe Lincoln ( who was not the first choice during his time. It was William Seward ).

So, all of your reasons are actually NOT GOOD ONES at all.


58 posted on 04/29/2016 9:02:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
So, all of your reasons are actually NOT GOOD ONES at all.

Everybody is entitled to their opinion, but yours suck so I'll choose to ignore it.

62 posted on 04/29/2016 9:11:15 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

>But why knock Ted Cruz and call him a cheater when all he’s doing is familiarizing himself with the primary process and working to garner the necessary delegates to win?

CO wasn’t cheating? A state where Trump is polling at 44% and Cruz got all the delegates? Heck even the GOP there is claiming their “process was flawed” and needs a do over. Cruz cheats all day long.


65 posted on 04/29/2016 9:21:28 AM PDT by RedWulf (Defeat Hillery or kiss the republic goodbye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson