Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

All those American soldiers fighting in Iraq who were killed, wounded, or crippled ....

FOR NOTHING!!!!


9 posted on 04/30/2016 11:20:42 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: elcid1970

Yep......VERY UPSETTING. OBAMA IS GIVING IRAQ TO IRAN AND MEANWHILE HERE HE DETRACTS THE MASSES.


11 posted on 04/30/2016 11:27:44 AM PDT by ColdOne (poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970

Personally I think anything we do for muslims is for nothing...except our own destruction by importing them.

Their mindset is totally contrary to western civilization and it’s a total mistake for us to think we can really give them democracy and expect them to adjust to it. That religion demands total subservience and that is what it gets.


15 posted on 04/30/2016 12:12:29 PM PDT by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970
Moqtada al-Sadr

Allied troops should have put that mad dog down when they had the mosque where he was 'hiding' in the early days of IW 2.

The Green Zone. How many $billions did GWB and Co spend on that debacle?
16 posted on 04/30/2016 12:18:04 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970

We were wrong to invade Iraq in 2003.


17 posted on 04/30/2016 12:19:48 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970; TomasUSMC
All those American soldiers fighting in Iraq who were killed, wounded, or crippled .... FOR NOTHING!!!!

That it was for nothing was decided long before the first Marine crossed the starting line in March of 2003.

I posted THIS on September 13, 2001, and within 72 hours Idiot Bush had made his decision to fight a Vietnam War in South Asia (my option #2), as I predicted he would.

What does a "Vietnam war" mean in this context? It means, we take casualties to demonstrate that we are serious, but we refuse to conquer to demonstrate that we are not mean.

This feminine sort of warfighting has never accomplished a single useful thing anywhere, ever, and yet the entire Uniparty is wedded to it.

23 posted on 04/30/2016 1:45:29 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Cruz never could have outfought Trump. I never knew, until this day, that it was Romney all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson