Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Lt. Gov. Newsom, lawmakers on collision course over gun control
Fox News ^ | 5-2-16 | Malia Zimmerman

Posted on 05/02/2016 9:43:21 PM PDT by smokingfrog

California’s Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Democratic lawmakers appear to be on a collision course over a new round of gun control measures.

Newsom, claiming lawmakers are dragging their feet, is collecting thousands of signatures in pursuit of a gun initiative ballot measure in November. But lawmakers say they’re planning to address these issues via legislation, and the initiative could hurt what they’re doing.

Critics also say the proposed California ballot initiative contains a wide variety of restrictive, costly and unreasonable gun and ammunition control measures.

The proposed “Safety for All As of 2016” initiative has 600,000 signatures from California residents, nearly double the number required to be included on the November ballot, Newsom told the Los Angeles Times. He added that what the initiative proposals have in common is “that over the past number of years they have suffered the fate of either being watered down or rejected by the Legislature.”

The signatures still must be validated.

But leading lawmakers, including Democratic Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De Leon, say they are working to address these issues legislatively. In addition, the mandate is extremely difficult to change and will be the subject of a hearing at the Capitol in Sacramento Tuesday.

“California's legislative leaders are busy considering crime bills, while Newsom is circumventing them,” said Michele Hanisee, president of the Association of Los Angeles Deputy District Attorneys, in a written statement and interview with FoxNews.com. “The only way we're going to make progress against violence is through a cooperative effort of law enforcement, legislators, the private sector, and individual citizens who can take some responsibility for their own safety. Self-serving political schemes like Newsom's initiative will only set us back.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ammunition; backgroundchecks; banglist; bigoted; bigotry; california; gavinnewsom; guncontrol; racism; racist
They'd rather go after your gun rights than the criminals.
1 posted on 05/02/2016 9:43:21 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Honestly, this state’s leaders are almost criminally insane.


2 posted on 05/02/2016 9:46:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Newsome has blood on his hands as SF Mayor. An ms-13 thug killed a man + 2 of his sons over a traffic dispute. Now he’s in line to be the Gov.


3 posted on 05/02/2016 9:47:20 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

It appears that the time is getting close for when the American people are going to have to remind the goofy politicians what the Second Amendment as all about.


4 posted on 05/02/2016 9:53:03 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (ESPN. Where girlymen go to get their sports news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Wow, it’s understandable that Kimberley Guilfoyle is no longer married to him.......total Leftist/Socialist!


5 posted on 05/02/2016 9:53:54 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

California tried to ban handguns in 1982. It failed.

Since that day they have been working overtime to circumvent the will of the voters.

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15,_Handgun_Registration_Initiative_%281982%29


6 posted on 05/02/2016 9:58:48 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I have to seriously question her judgment based on that.


7 posted on 05/02/2016 9:59:27 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

They all know these laws affect zero criminals.


8 posted on 05/02/2016 10:13:47 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Start with the question, “What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ do you not understand?”


9 posted on 05/02/2016 10:19:34 PM PDT by ArmyTeach ( Videteco eos prius (See 'em first) Sculpin 191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Prop 8 was a ballot initiative. Courts struck it down.

Will the court have the courage to toss this one?


10 posted on 05/02/2016 10:25:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Those signing the initiative should be agreeing to a voluntary relinquishing of firearms through a search of their homes and businesses for any weapons.


11 posted on 05/02/2016 10:34:23 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Not almost..


12 posted on 05/02/2016 10:34:49 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
California tried to ban handguns in 1982. It failed.,

Calif is a far different state than it was even in 1982. I saw it creeping up and bailed out in 2006, barely in time.

13 posted on 05/02/2016 11:03:40 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I see this helping Trump win California...


14 posted on 05/03/2016 2:32:21 AM PDT by Does so (Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

We simply need to expose this measure as a RACIST ATTACK on black and Hispanic minorities who will be most impacted by the criminal and punitive measures in this ill-conceived law.

Then sit back and watch as Gavin Newsome gets pilloried by other Democrats for being a racist who wants to put more young minority men in prison.


15 posted on 05/03/2016 8:22:36 AM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Based just on that, I to would question he judgement.
Perhaps being that closely associated a piece of crap like Newsom caused her survival instincts and conservatism to kick in.


16 posted on 05/03/2016 12:24:29 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson