Posted on 05/26/2016 8:47:09 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Look at that face! The personification of the “Red Queen”
“The incident was never reported to computer security personnel at State.”
This fully the equivalent of the crime of moving or having the information off the govt network in the first place.
This transcends the whole absolutely invalid “accident/on purpose” tangent she has claimed. There is nothing in the USC 18 law that suggests “accident/on purpose” has any applicability. This is like saying “I was wearing my purple pantsuit that day, so I have a good reason to believe the law does not apply to me”. It’s absurd.
The gravity of the duty to protect classified information is perfectly mirrored by the gravity of the duty to report a breach. Period.
A degenerate reflection of a degenerate population.
The Long & Winding Road, of Lies that Lead...To YOUR DOOR!
Will Never Disappear.
We’ve seen that road before,
If the Herald is saying this the game is afoot.
L
I'm pretty sure you're referring to the Red Queen of Lewis Carroll, but the one from The Manchurian Candidate works pretty well too.
Cankles is having a really bad week and I hope this culminates with Californians handing her fat ass a swift kick on June 7. Even the lamestream media cannot help cover this IG report. Of course, they’re not doing it with anywhere near the vigor they would have if this were about a GOP candidate. Only 573 articles on Google News about Hillary and Emails. I’d bet it’d be 10X for a GOP candidate.
Bite your lip, hang your cat, storm the compound, swiss boarding school, blue dress, cigar stuffing, Natalie Portman boonies, razor back pig ear rings, kind of really bad editorial.
Climb a tree and tell a lie or stand on the ground and tell the truth?
She thought she was going to slow walk this thing past the election...NOT.
The Clinton dynasty is about to fall...
Oh. Also kick the cancer kids out of the photo op, kind of bad editorial.
YES. AND the reason Hillary got away with that lie is because newspapers like the Boston Herald didn't assign platoons of reporters to GO AND ASK if Hillary was telling the truth.
Why?
Lack of intellectual diversity (how many conservatives on staff guys ?) My guess is democrat 'insiders' who send top editors packets of potential stories didn't include any that might make Hillary look bad.
And these folks wonder why there's buy-outs, layoffs - - and Americans don't trust newspapers?
Here's a HINT guys: STOP writing for prizes and START writing for the trust and respect of your readers.
Tree or Trie. ?
Boston Herald.
It’s pretty clear at this point to everyone, even everyone in the Democrat party, that Hillary is not going to be elected president. Probably even Hillary sees it, if she’d be truthful with herself.
We are moving quickly from necessary hits on Hillary to weaken her to overkill on a dead political corpse. Events are moving so quickly that keeping in front of them is an impossible task.
That conservative Boston Herald again. It is so biased...oops!
“nothing her predecessors didn’t do.”
Those predecessors didn’t have their own physical server.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.