ping
It may be sufficient help that a candidate is useful, even if far far far from perfect.
We’re choosing a secular steward, not a godfather, for crying out loud.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Every one of the other GOP contenders were not my “ideal.” Actually, I would be my ideal, and there are a handful of others who I would give the nod to, but they didn’t run.
EVERY GOP CANDIDATE WAS/IS A COMPROMISE! As that was undoubtedly true, I SHOULD VOTE FOR “NONE OF THE ABOVE.
I gave to Cruz, but I voted for and support Trump. EVERY OTHER CONSERVATIVE SHOULD REALIZE THE COMPROMISE STILL MOVES THE COUNTRY FORWARD.
You “NeverTrumpers” have got to get a freaking clue. Cruz was as bad as Trump, and I was willing to vote Cruz.
Emo Philips bit on religious tolerance and diversity
It's 100% or nothing. There is nothing in between. And the reality is that NO candidate, now or in the past, would actually pass what they demand for ideological purity. It's just sour grapes over their first chosen candidate losing - and rather than continuing to play they will take their ball and go home.
I don’t understand it. Trump, nor anyone, is perfect. Cruz had a huge likeability handicap and was smart enough and honorable enough to bow out when he could see the road ahead was closed.
I have a friend who was all in for Cruz and now that Cruz bowed out; he washed his hands of this whole election like it was Cruz or nothing.
Well nothing could be more untrue. Broomhilda still needs to be beat like a rented mule and Trump is the person we have now to do that.
Yeah; I don’t get fair weather conservatives at all.