Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet

“The report, however, did not dispute that United States military forces stationed in Europe could not have reached Benghazi in time to rescue the personnel who died - a central finding of previous inquiries.”

The attack went on for what, 12 hours, and they could not have been reached in time. Incredible.


3 posted on 06/28/2016 8:26:59 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DonaldC

I guess they knew how long the attack would last when they made the decision not to go. BS.


21 posted on 06/28/2016 8:34:58 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC
“The report, however, did not dispute that United States military forces stationed in Europe could not have reached Benghazi in time to rescue the personnel who died

At decision-making time (first minutes/hours) they had no idea how long it would last and they decided not to try to help. At that point they had no reason to be sure that help could not arrive in time and THEY DECIDED NOT TO TRY TO HELP.

Don't let the media use hindsight to justify the decision. It doesn't even matter if I agree with their hindsight or not it's a simple argument to show it was the wrong decision at the time it was made (unless you don't want to help Americans under attack).
29 posted on 06/28/2016 8:40:13 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

What about the military forces in Tripoli, Malta, the Mediterranean???


44 posted on 06/28/2016 9:04:48 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: All
“The report, however, did not dispute that United States military forces stationed in Europe could not have reached Benghazi in time to rescue the personnel who died - a central finding of previous inquiries.”

Here is a video of Rep. Chaffetz saying that Gen. Ham, commander of AFRICOM at that time, told him that assets were near enough to help and ready to go.

AFRICOM leader General Carter Ham was never given the order to secure the consulate in Benghazi. Youtube 1:43

Adm. James Lyons (Ret.) on Growing Benghazi Scandal

ADMIRAL LYONS: …All those comforting words that “We don’t want to put our forces at risk.” We had people at risk—they were crying for help! In a situation, you go with the resources you have available—and, in this particular case, we did have that 130-man Marine force recon team sitting there at Sigonella. Even if I only got 50 of them over there, that would have been significant in turning the situation around. We may not have been able to save the ambassador, but we certainly could have saved those other two SEALs that were over on the annex.

ADMIRAL LYONS: In perpetuating this lie, we also had administration officials lying to Congressional committees. That’s a felony. So, “What difference does it make?” It makes all the difference in the world. You cannot flaunt the truth here, just walk away from it and, basically, tell the American public to stuff it. That’s not acceptable.

The point on the organizing the two Marine anti-terrorist teams in Rota, that was good to go ahead and stand ’em up. What I find incomprehensible: The first team, it took them 23 hours to go a few hundred miles from Rota to Tripoli. I could go around the world in 23 hours, so that makes absolutely no sense to me.

There is no doubt whatsoever that the assets were in motion preparing to receive an order to go.

How the military preps.

How an embassy rescue works.

Cross Border Authority.

46 posted on 06/28/2016 9:09:10 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson