What a shame.
Whatever happened to “Freedom of Association”
How many “Christian” homosexuals are going to even go on this site???
If this is a site devoted to matching Christian singles, and if virtually all Christian denominations oppose homosexual marriage, by definition, how many homosexuals are going to go on this site in the first place?????
Gays want to pervert and contaminate everything. They have tons of freedom in this nation yet they act like termites wanting to destroy it all over their petty little bitchiness psycho sexual issues. Sodom and Gomorrah ping.
Not surprising these filth caved to the Gaystapo, quite typical and predictable.
Do muslims have a dating site, or are these hook-ups arranged?
Next we’ll have a government mandated take a queer home for lunch.
Well darn! Who are we to think that we are entitled to our own opinions and standards?
This means the KKK has to accept blacks and Jews now.
They will need to change their name unless they’re not concerned Jesus will sue them
Since the proprietors didn’t have the guts to fold up shop instead of surrender, their current customers ought to do it for them.
Good luck with that 3% customer base.
Crazy, no hint of going after “Arab date” or “Islam Date”. Perhaps because Islam is already a Sodomite religion.
This world has gone mad. I guess I should be able to go on adam4adam.com or a similar gay website and search for straight women.
What an absolute joke Kalifornia is.
I emailed them in the past about their questionable christian advertising. “find your soul mate” which is unbiblical. In the back and forth emails I got repeated answers about numbers of connections/marriages the site is supposedly responsible for but no real answer to why they use “find your soulmate”.
I got the impression they are quasi Christian at best since they seemed so concerned about numbers and drawing in more people so they can spout so many millions of users on their site (and pay fees i guess?)
Now i hear commercials saying “christian mingle, where “good people meet good people” what does that mean? Hillary thinks she is good. Obama thinks he’s good. I surely would not want to “mingle” with them online or off.
Garbage. That isn’t Christian.
I didn’t know they didn’t allow gay online match-making services. /s
As mentioned in related threads, please consider the following.
The only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights as evidenced by the 19th Amendment. And since politically correct LGBT “rights” are clearly outside the scope of voting issues, such “rights” not expressly protected by the Constitution like the enumerated rights are.
In other words, LGBT “rights,” including gay “marriage,” are being legislated from bench using 10th Amendment-protected state powers that activist judges and justices are stealing from the states.
Also, note that when the states ratified the 14th Amendment (14A) they prohibited themselves from abridging constitutionally enumerated rights as evidenced by Section 1.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
So low-information, pro-LGBT activist state officials and judges who are using constitutionally unprotected, pro-LGBT equality rights to trump constitutionally enumerated rights, the 1st Amendment-protected rights of religious expression and speech in such cases, are unthinkingly violating Section 1 of the 14A imo.
Also consider that when the Founding States drafted the Constitution, they had prohibited both themselves and the feds from establishing protected / privileged classes. This is evidenced by the following constitutional clauses.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States [emphasis added]: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility [emphasis added].
So by making laws and policies which promote constitutionally unrecognized LGBT “rights” and privileges, both the feds and pro-gay activist states are effectively violating these clauses imo.
On the other hand, what is worse, pro-gay activist federal and state officials who are abusing their government powers to make life miserable for Christians, or Christians who evidently don’t know their constitutional protections well enough to protect their lives and businesses from unconstitutional government interference?
In fact, citizens with religious convictions should note regarding exercising their 14th Amendment protections that Acts 22:23-30 shows that Paul claimed his rights as a Roman citizen to save himself from being flogged.
Homosexual Muslims don’t dare advertise for fear of being murdered.
“Christian” Mingle acceding to this is the worst thing about it. What they do is UN CHRISTIAN.