Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obama Policy That Left Ambassador Chris Stevens Defenseless In Benghazi ( AARON KLEIN
Breitbart ^ | July 4,2016 | by AARON KLEIN

Posted on 07/04/2016 4:59:01 PM PDT by Hojczyk

TEL AVIV – Murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens had originally planned to arrive in Benghazi with Pentagon assistance and attempted to coordinate with the Defense Department in order to be housed on a protected coalition naval vessel for a period of time

However, the Obama Administration’s “no boots on the ground” policy directly precluded such protection, which would have required Stevens to stay overnight with the military at sea and take a boat to land when he was required to be on the ground in the chaotic country of Libya.

After weeks of planning, the military assistance was nixed because of the administration’s decision against putting “boots on the ground,” the correspondence cited in the Benghazi report divulges:

After weeks of planning, the Administration’s no boots on the ground policy kept military assistance from accompanying Stevens to Benghazi.

On March 30, 2011, Kennedy informed other senior State Department leaders: “After over a week of joint planning … [Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael] Mullen has decided that the ‘no boots on the ground in Libya’ policy precludes DOD assisting us in getting Stevens into Libya.”

Specifically, Admiral Mullen deemed the use of military assets—even in civilian dress—to be in violation of the President’s directive, and therefore forbade their use to get Stevens into Benghazi and assist in his protection there. With no military assets to assist, Stevens “found a way to get himself there on a Greek cargo ship, just like a 19th-century American envoy.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: New York; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aaronklein; arkansas; benghazi; blackberry; canada; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; crisisofcharacter; election2016; garybyrne; garyjbyrne; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; humaabedin; iran; libya; newyork; pages; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; treygowdy; trump; uranium; waronterror; wipewater

1 posted on 07/04/2016 4:59:01 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Legal question: Can either Hilary, as former Sec of State and potential Commander in Chief, or Obama as Commander in Chief, be prosecuted by the military for violations of national security, dereliction of duty, desertion (going home while American forces under fire) or other charges?
2 posted on 07/04/2016 5:08:09 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

Neither Hillary nor Obama are subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, so the answer is no. Obama is commander-in-chief, but he is not subject to the UCMJ.


3 posted on 07/04/2016 5:10:56 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Hillary would remind you “What difference does it make?”


4 posted on 07/04/2016 5:14:13 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal
Legal question: Can either Hilary, as former Sec of State and potential Commander in Chief, or Obama as Commander in Chief, be prosecuted by the military for violations of national security...

No. But Obama can be impeached. As can Hillary -- if elected.

5 posted on 07/04/2016 5:15:52 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Damn these traitors.

This IS a kind of prayer for our ‘leaders’. Just not real positive.


6 posted on 07/04/2016 5:18:14 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If he was using open communications for convenience, every government and terrorist entity knew he was there and why. Communications surveillance is universal even here on Free Republic.


7 posted on 07/04/2016 5:41:35 PM PDT by Rapscallion (You are correct. There has been a conspiracy. It has not just been a bad dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

They (the news media) report, and we discuss everything about Benghazi except the reason it was necessary Ambassador Stevens be there in the first place.

Let’s discuss that aspect of this, and see if we agree he had no business being there as the Obama Administration just might have been doing something it shouldn’t, and for whose benefit?

I think we’ve been led off the trail again.


8 posted on 07/04/2016 6:12:14 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The Bastard-in-Chief is guilty with Hillary as his accessory.


9 posted on 07/04/2016 6:23:02 PM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 15 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Stevens was murdered due to Obama White House politics.
That is the most polite way to put it. I never knew
Chris Stevens although he was born in my small home
town in Northern California. I did know his grandfather,
Elmer “Chief” Stevens. Chief was a frequent substitute HS
teacher and a great guy who never was known to utter
an unkind word. He had been my older sister’s history
teacher in the mid 1960s before retirement. I bet Chief
would have a few unkind things to say about about Obama,
Clinton, and the rest of that pack of Rats post Benghazi.


10 posted on 07/04/2016 6:29:29 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

When obama brought the turncoat, bergdahl, home and celebrated in the rose garden, he repeated the line.. never leave a man behind. Then he leaves the Ambassador behind in benghazi to be killed.


11 posted on 07/04/2016 7:36:25 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

No boots on ground prevented Stevens from getting there with any help from DOD; but we had a building full of CIA agents a few miles away? How did they all get there?


12 posted on 07/04/2016 8:14:04 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...

Benghazi ping.

Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.


13 posted on 07/06/2016 7:13:14 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

bttt


14 posted on 07/06/2016 7:15:30 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

More importantly WHAT were they doing there?


15 posted on 07/06/2016 8:22:00 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Trump is exposing the Fifth Column in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

Your post wins the internet!!!!!!!! Excellent!


16 posted on 07/06/2016 8:48:03 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Thank you. Appreciate the feedback.


17 posted on 07/06/2016 8:51:14 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

Personally, I think they’re guilty of war crimes. Libya, Egypt, ....


18 posted on 07/06/2016 8:54:38 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel (a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Obviously, neither Obama nor Clinton will face impeachment by this Congress. That's why legal alternatives are needed.
One or more states attorney general could prosecute. What about the possibility of one or more states barring her from the ballot on the grounds she is not eligible to serve as CIC?
19 posted on 07/06/2016 10:03:00 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal
One or more states attorney general could prosecute.

What state laws has she broken?

What about the possibility of one or more states barring her from the ballot on the grounds she is not eligible to serve as CIC?

But she meets all the constitutional criteria for eligibility. She's over 35, resident or over 14 years and is, by any measure, a natural born citizen.

If we can't deny her election, then impeachment is the only remedy. And you are correct -- it ain't gonna happen.

20 posted on 07/06/2016 10:54:31 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson