[marktwain]

There are 39% of uniformed people voting for more ineffective and expensive infringements on the Second Amendment.

[butlerweave]

sounds like a total waste of money they don’t have

[mylife]

They come up with million arguments to disarm us while they march along

[dynachrome]

Read the story and:

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!***
FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. (multiple votes using multiple internetz devices are allowed!)
And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin’, if I miss them.
(looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

Direct link to poll:
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/polls/2016/jul/would-you-vote-require-background-checks-ammunitio/

[mylife]

Lets have background checks for kitchen knives boots and rocks

Funny how Hillary blipped off the map and they call to disarm us once again

[Red Badger]

I would vote for background checks on politicians.............

[dynachrome]

This is a bit like the ban on selling or transferring “high capacity” magazines in Colorado. The cops don’t enforce it because no one knows when you bought that magazine, before or after the ban. Or if you drove to Utah or Nebraska and bought a bunch.

[rockinqsranch]

Personally don’t want any such thing as a background check to purchase ammo. Not afraid of anything other then leftist government keeping record of what I have purchased so they know what types of weapons I have. I’d rather not have them know what I own.

[jsanders2001]

Not just NO but HELL NO. No infringement at all.

[Mr. Mojo]

I wouldn’t even vote for background checks on a friggen cannon.

[mrmeyer]

Looks like the yes folks want violent “civil” conflict.

[WENDLE]

I just went there and dropped the bome. 62% “no damned way” Ban terrorists— NOT GUNS!!

[<1/1,000,000th%]

No 63%

[tubebender]

63% no

[editor-surveyor]

.
The role of the Demoncrat party in California is to make California safe for Terrorists and mass murderers.
.

[2111USMC]

This poll is a waste of time.

THE LAW HAS ALREADY BEEN PASSED!

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-gun-bills-20160519-snap-story.html

[faithhopecharity]

Californication politicians are so sick and snti-American it’s just nauseating. Anyone still there should get out ASAP before real serious troubles begin there Enough said

[Robert DeLong]

35% - YES
64% - NO

[BigEdLB]

35-64. If you pass the gun background check it is redundant.

[BAW]

64% No
35% Stupid

[longfellow]

I always do background checks on ammo. Cheaper than dirt are pretty good.