Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Oh sure, McQueery just somehow guessed that Sandusky was a pedo who liked to diddle little boys and got it right. What a coinkydink!


15 posted on 07/13/2016 8:30:45 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
What a coinkydink!

McQueary saw "something." He told his father, a coach, and the VP responsible for the University police "something." (And based on his testimony, it's likely he told each of them "something" else.)

Unfortunately, we will never know what the "something" was, because McQueary has told many different stories under many different circumstances to many different audiences.

What we KNOW about McQueary's "something" is that of all of the charges made against Sandusky, McQueary's evidence was one of the very few not believed by a Jury.

That is not a coincidence. McQueary is not believable.

20 posted on 07/13/2016 8:53:55 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson