Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cheerio
Translation of the news: When I saw "unqualified," I concluded that the candidate was not an unsuitable, angry, Jewish, woman-lawyer from New York, but an unsuitable, angry, light-skinned black woman from the Beltway. The hypothesis was confirmed.

In a state-run media article, a key word or two, included or oddly absent, is what points to the real story. The rest is camouflage.

The real story is an answer to the question, "Since this is a Democratic appointment, what kind of corruption is being evinced here--installing a visionary saboteur with vast contacts and credentials, or rewarding a time-server?" In this case, the answer appears to be "time-server."

17 posted on 07/14/2016 8:07:47 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamuraiScot

I had the exact same suspicions - nowdays they prove right 90% of the time. And now with BLM terrorizing whites into appeasement, “affirmative action” will be on steroids as our country sinks into third world status.


23 posted on 07/14/2016 8:16:43 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson