I hate that drudge linked to jim hofts story that is perpetuating the sorcha faal psy ops. Hoft needs to go find the claim about fbi Before the date of Faal’s story. It probably doesnt exist and if it does it was probably faal posting
Its this kind of crap that gives them ammo to call us nuts
ConservativeTribune has the story also.
Et tu, RummyChick?
I hate that drudge linked to jim hofts story that is perpetuating the sorcha faal psy ops. Hoft needs to go find the claim about fbi Before the date of Faal’s story. It probably doesnt exist and if it does it was probably faal posting
Its this kind of crap that gives them ammo to call us nuts
YOU WERE ON THE OTHER THREAD! Where it was discussed for two pages! You know damn well this has nothing to do with Sorch Faal - what are you trying to do, taint the actual VIDEO of Assange insinuating very clearly that Rich was the source?
What the freak are your motives for this crap?
Except you are wrong on this count
Maybe you should look at this thread, from last week or so.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3455024/posts
The day he died, there were already credible rumors swirling that he was a source of info for “someone”.
At the time he died: It was believed he had knowledge of HRC’s servers, email - something to do with that.
There were definitely rumors about him being a source of info. within a few hours.
I’m on the fence. I don’t usually indulge in conspiracy theories, but b/c I know as fact that ppl already knew he’d provided some information to some person—it’s shady as heck.
OTOH it puts Cankles on the wrong foot; will call light onto the intervening fact that the DNC is staffless via DNCLeaks; and is too juicy for any MSM outlet to ignore, even if they try and stuff it through as clickbait. 10/10
They call us nuts anyway.