Excerpted from the article:
Author’s notes:
The primary reason for outlining this brief is to deliver a greater understanding of why things happened the way they did in the post 9/11/12 attack media frenzy.
If you understand what took place from March 2011 through the night of the attack itself all of the contradictions reconcile, and most of the questions become answered.
Factually, I would challenge anyone who reads this brief to actually have a question left unanswered.
The events of the attack itself are gut wrenching and troubling. Our brave operations folks had to fight their way out of a situation where they literally were on their own due to the political risks inherent in carrying out their objectives.
However, they knew they were beyond the wire, they knew they were covert – they knew there was no manner, method or possibility of protection…. And this is the point everyone seems to miss:
THEY HAD TO KNOW THE DoD WAS IN THE DARK ABOUT THEIR ACTIVITY. There was NOTHING the Pentagon could have done to help them. Those people inside the Eastern Libya City of Benghazi, operating on behalf of the administration, were, for all intents and purposes, GHOSTS. They did not “technically” exist.
Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the mission they were tasked to carry out, there is no doubt they worked honorably to serve their nation. Ultimately the leadership within the State Department, The CIA, and the White House are responsible for the outcomes of policy.
Our hope is that this outline will stimulate journalists to question those who were at the heart of these two operations. Ultimately the Trey Gowdy select committee will find there is no venue to discuss intelligence operations with public sunlight. While both Zero Footprint in 2011, and the Unnamed CIA operation in 2012 were flawed policy – they were not necessarily illegal.
There is a matter of an unidentified State Dept $6 billion contractor fund missing from Hillary’s term as Secretary of State; that might bear investigation. However, beyond those smaller questions there is little if anything to gain.
FUBAR.
~ Sundance
BTTT until EVERYONE READS THIS!!!!!
bump
(from somewhere in england)
But that doesn't relieve anyone of the responsibility to save human lives when it is possible .... even more so ... deny the help that is requested/needed.
just read the whole article, WOW!
Amazing stuff.
I’m thinking the advanced Stinger serial number represents an illegal act of transfer of technology against which our own aircraft are not defended. I think I recall a prohibition on transfer of such weaponry.
Thanks for posting V K Lee...
I read every word-—Breathtaking... isn’t it?
Researching Freepers suspected as much, but Sundance has connected all the dots.
Sundance says [modestly]: “Our hope is that this outline will stimulate journalists to question those who were at the heart of these two operations.”
Giant thumbs up to Sundance.
It may take another 5-15 years (depending on who wins the 2016 election) for the definitive Pulitzer to be awarded on this squalid, dangerous and anti-American period of American history-—specifically the Obama WH/Hillary State Dept/CIA/R2P Powers administration-— but any Pulitzer recipient that doesn’t give a hat tip to Sundance will never earn my respect.
Maybe it is time we establish alternative-media Pulitzers?
Excellent piece, Clinton was in it up to her eyebrows.
Thank you both for the pings.