Posted on 08/25/2016 8:56:20 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
This would be funny if it weren’t so ironically hypocritical. There was reporter Jeremy Peters, of the New York Times—appearing on MSNBC—piously condemning “Sean Hannity’s incredibly inappropriate role as an adviser to Donald Trump who is essentially giving him tens of millions of dollars of free advertising.”
Just what does Peters think the MSM is: from his own New York Times to MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, the Washington Post, etc., if not one huge monolith devoted to electing Hillary Clinton and other Dems while destroying Donald Trump? If Hannity is giving Trump “tens of millions” in free advertising, what is the combined value of free advertising that the MSM is giving to Hillary Clinton?
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Peters TALKS a lot, but I have NEVER heard him REPORT anything!! Just another GAY LEFTIE.
He looks like a smarmy little prick who would have spent a lot of time being held upside down over a toilet bowl when I was in high school.
CNN barely reported the Clinton Foundation Scandal AP story when it broke. Now today they give Hillary’s response screaming headlines. I wonder how Mr. Peters (D-NYTimes) feels about that “free advertising”?
Should we laugh, cry or scream? New York Times reporter complains that Hannity is giving Trump free advertising.
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
I bet Hannity would be happy to give Hillary a full hour for an interview and conversation. Does anyone think she’d accept?
There’s nothing illegal about that. Hillary should do a press conference.
ABCNBCCBSCNNMSLSDNPRLAT, ET ALIA unavailable for comment.
I love it when Greta gives a live report from a Trump rally. She is quick to note that she has made the same offer to Clinton who has not called to set up an interview or any time.
Hannity said on his show last night that the same opportunity was given to Hillary and they never responded to him.
She will except about the fifth of never.
Actually at the beginning Hannity did state that his show did reach out the Clinton camp for doing a special with her on immigration, his producers have not received a response back
So no, she did not accept
Fixed it for ya...
The *F***ING GALL* of these people!
The regular networks are nothing but one big propaganda organ for the Democrat party, and this @$$hole dares suggest that someone is out of line for doing what they have been routinely doing for the last fifty years?
If he's interested in getting laws passed banning the networks from providing free advertising for political parties, i'm all for it, because it would shut down all the news services and most of the entertainment services.
A typical “cum laud” graduate of the former Joesph Goebbels School of Propaganda. He learned his lesson very well
The hypocracy has become the rule in the MSM.
Also, the balanced 'panels' on CNN and others are a hoot. One Trump supporter, one GOP person who hates Trump, a Rat who backs Clinton, and a Rat operative....the 'moderator' is also an undisguised Trump hater.
They are soooo transparently biased.
Looks like a nancy boy to me. I’m sure Trump hurt his feelings at one time.
This guy LITERALLY has a pencil neck.
well I thought the NYT was upset at Trump’s harshness against IA’s it was mostly about being more humane. Is he opposed to being humane?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.