Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Proud Canadian

3 warning shots.

At four Iranian ships carrying out a “high speed intercept.”

Now, I am not in the Navy, nor was I ever, nor do I play a Naval Officer on TV. However, the thing with big guns (and the 5’54” guns are big) is that they have a relatively low rate of fire. IOW, perhaps they wouldn’t be such a big deterrent. If’n I were the captain of that destroyer, I’d have been far more tempted to use the Phalanx CIWS for my warning shots - because that system is FAR more able to take out 4 fast boats quickly. That’s the system that you’d most likely use to actually defend the ship with, so why not use it for warning shots?


15 posted on 08/25/2016 12:59:42 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ancesthntr

Because the bigger guns would be LOUDER to the distant Iranian ships, is why they were chosen, I bet.


27 posted on 08/25/2016 1:45:47 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Ancesthntr

Some of those fast Iranian boats carry 2 or more Silkworm anti-ship missiles ... which would be launched before the other fast boats made contact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silkworm_(missile)


36 posted on 08/26/2016 5:14:15 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson