Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

We essentially have two houses, both elected by the people. However, thinking that the state reps electing the Senate would work out better, HAHAHAHAH with all the RINOS?


109 posted on 08/31/2016 7:32:59 AM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (VMFA 235 '69-72)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998

While I would like to eventually see the 17th repealed, right now, you’d have party big shots picking subversives like Karl Rove and wealthy moderates like David Dewhurst (TX). Not to mention that since all legislative houses are now 1 man, 1 vote, you’d effectively have representatives from corrupt big cities picking a number of the Senators as well. The Senate would inevitably pursue a globalist agenda and be even more in thrall to strong, liberal Presidents like 0bama. The states would continue to ride in the back of the bus.

Repealing the 17th would have to be accompanied by a lot of other things for it to turn out well.


113 posted on 08/31/2016 10:32:31 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cuckservative: a "conservative" willing to raise another country's ideology in his own country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson