Posted on 08/30/2016 9:53:40 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Bingo, you both got it.
Everything’s a “Center of Excellence” now. If you see “COE” in the acronym, that’s what it stands for. At the clinic on Fort Meade, there’s a “Hallway of Excellence” complete with a sign hanging from the ceiling, I kid you not.
It began life as a Jeep (M-38 or M-151) replacement.
That's all it ever was and still is. When the AQI and their Shi'ite cohorts stepped up their IED game in Iraq, the Army had no response whatsoever, so they just crammed a ton of armor onto Humvees and suped up the suspension to compensate. It was never, ever meant for that kind of mission, and the results show.
#16: BINGO! We have a Winner!
I’m not so sure.
1. The 30mm is a HUGE mount. I don’t see it being anything other than an electro-mechanical T&E mechanism. That places an additional electrical and maintenance burden on the vehicle and weapons system.
2. The rounds are 2-3 times the size of .50cal. That means MUCH less ammo.
Not only that, but the 30mm barrel has a tendency to overheat and comes with a burst limiter, which is usually set to 10 or 20 round bursts in the Apache. Not exactly a good thing in the heat of ground combat.
I suspect that the light barrel was optimized for the Apache, which has to lift the thing. Perhaps a HB variant like that of the M2 would be a more appropriate solution for a grounded weapon.
What do you expect from the same organization that turned itself inside out and compromised it’s own standards to graduate women from the Ranger Course? As another poster mentioned above, this has less to do with being combat effective and more to do with keeping the defense industry money flowing.
Sounds great but the gun and its mechanism is about 20 feet long and weighs quite a lot (not sure how much). The 30mm rounds are much bigger than .50 cal which means that you’ll either need more onboard storage or carry less ammo.
I can see this as a great addition to the Scout vehicle but they should leave the Deuce in place for close in social work. Just my $.02.
Caveat to my earlier post - I’m no expert but I worked with about 30 Apache pilots and crewmen for several years creating training for the Apache. Learned a lot from them but not everything.
2. The rounds are 2-3 times the size of .50cal. That means MUCH less ammo.
That was my thought, too. About 5 years ago I was working on a Navy contract mounting 30 and 40mm guns on Blackhawks. It put a large amount of stress on the mounts and frames.
The bigger gun isn't much of an advantage if you can only carry 200 rounds of ammo.
“”Centers of Excellence””
21st Century phrase for testing center. We had our code testing facilities renamed centers of excellence. Didn’t matter. Without process and training the apps teams pumped out the same crap code.
Doesn’t the UH-60 DAP (Direct Action Penetrator) have a 30mm option on the stub wings?
I would second that. Also the Russian type large machine guns in 14mm or so. Heck, even a 20mm machine gun exists out there that can be easily crew maintained and with as much power if not more than the Bushmaster 30 mm.
The Bushmaster has a complex timing system of shell delivery and ejection using gears and bike chain that is very delicate. It is fine with an aircraft away from dirt, but on the ground like this and you will quickly chaff the gears and thus loose the timing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.