Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay

“should have adequately known some psychopath was likely to come in guns a blazing?”

In this case, yes, because Cinemark had a no forearms sign which means they knew there are people with guns out there that they were afraid of and demanded they do not bring their guns into the theater.


18 posted on 09/02/2016 11:37:32 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

Please, a no firearms policy does not turn into you should expect someone with them to target your establishment. This was a stupid lawsuit to bring, especially when Cinemark offered them a settlement, their own attorneys told them to take it, and the families refused and went to trial and LOST.

You don’t have to like the outcome, but clearly the families involved here made many bad decisions, and are now paying the price for it.


29 posted on 09/02/2016 11:48:51 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson