Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assange: Up to 100,000 pages of Clinton documents to come
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 09/08/2016 10:04:06 PM PDT by TigerClaws

WikiLeaks could release as many as 100,000 pages of new material related to Hillary Clinton before the election, Julian Assange said Thursday, thanks in part to new sources who stepped forward after the organization leaked internal emails from the Democratic National Committee.

"We have tens of thousands, possibly as many as a hundred thousand, pages of documents of different types, related to the operations that Hillary Clinton is associated with," the WikiLeaks founder said in a radio interview with Sean Hannity. "There are some, several … in response to the DNC publications, a lot of people have been inspired by the impact, and so they have stepped forward with additional material."

Assange said his organization released internal DNC documents just before the party's national convention because that was when staff finished vetting them, but that he hoped to have the newest documents out well before November.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assange; clinton; documents; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillarysemails; julianassange; pages; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

now that is a very logical idea...would not surprise me.


81 posted on 09/09/2016 9:49:23 AM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

I don’t think revealing a source who is deceased in any way compromises the rest of his sources.

*************

There are other considerations such as the impact on his family and close friends. It could put them in an uncomfortable position, if not some jeopardy. Assange has to think of their well being and respect their privacy.

That said, I agree with you it would shine a light on the truth.


82 posted on 09/09/2016 10:19:54 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I listened to the entire interview with Hannity, and I now have a better level of respect for the guy.

First, I think he goes to great lengths, to not harm national security.

Second, he said a couple on his side, were murdered.

So carefully screening the contents, is important.

(Because Republicans are racists, which they have been called since at least Reagan, and it works. So stick with what works.)

The DNC release, cost Wasserman-Schultz her position. Of course Clinton took her immediately onto the team, and no doubt pays her handsomely even if indirectly.

The public already knows the Clintons lie, but don’t seem to care very much.

The lies must be shown to be deadly, to cost people their lives, without any counter argument.

That might doom Hillary’s campaign. I am not optimistic.


83 posted on 09/09/2016 10:46:54 AM PDT by truth_seeker (#NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

100,000 pages / 60 days = 1666 per day.


84 posted on 09/09/2016 11:01:07 AM PDT by IVAXMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
Where is Assange living these days? He better get some extra security. Soros or Hilary will make an attempt on his life I have no doubt.
85 posted on 09/09/2016 11:01:14 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Yeah, yeah. More “just wait until you see what we release” hype. I’ll believe it when I see it. Cut the hype and release the docs.


86 posted on 09/09/2016 11:03:47 AM PDT by Antoninus ("The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately." -Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
The fact he even appeared on Hannity says something about his integrity to me. The left must absolutely hate his guts at this point. I wonder if he will be blacklisted from any interviews on CNN, NBC, ect...?
87 posted on 09/09/2016 11:04:36 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty

He said he doesn’t want to release before the 26th due to some dem rule that would lock her into the race.


88 posted on 09/09/2016 11:08:08 AM PDT by CJ Wolf (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Why doesn’t the guy just come out with it, like now.


89 posted on 09/09/2016 11:20:23 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Here's how I'm going to beat you. I'm going to out work you. That's all there is to it. -Pat Summitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert

Bert, the internet does. The emails are there. I searched “LOL” on the server today after seeing your post, just for kicks. The hilliary files have 5 “lol” emails.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/24428

Japan gets hit with an earthquake, nukes are melting, Hillary has two options. She notes that 2 is a red herring non starter. Unclear if she means go with #1. the aide asks for clarification. Email in return is LOL.

Great leadership. LOL


90 posted on 09/09/2016 11:26:20 AM PDT by CJ Wolf (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I don’t know what she did to piss off Julian but she must’ve really done it right.

Well, he called her a "war hawk with bad judgement" who gets an "emotional rush out of killing people". Those things don't seem to bother half of the voting public.

91 posted on 09/09/2016 11:32:22 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

yeah ok...... I’ll concede the point


92 posted on 09/09/2016 11:32:40 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... We Frack for Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
The only thing I can think of is that Donald Trump has expressed a moderate level of admiration for Vladimir Putin a couple of times, so Assange wants Trump to win?

Really? Do you get your info from Plouffe and Mook?

93 posted on 09/09/2016 11:34:48 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bert

So I did another search on another word. I feel sick.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/10411

May 5, 2011
“Yes, there is a Third Way—on the Bin Laden photos. Show them to members of Congress in a special secure room, something like when members were permitted to view Abu Ghraib pictures. Here are the reasons: Having the members file through will provide testimony to the President’s feat. They will be not only be acknowledging but also enhancing his power. They will in effect become liegemen bowing before him, but not in any way they will resent or will protest. They will serve as witnesses to the magnitude of what he has done. Each of them will emerge speaking to the national and local press on what they have seen. Their words will be descriptive, but they will not be equivalent to graphic images that could be circulated themselves and have mischievous consequences. Having the whole Congress see the photos would have these likely impacts as well: The far right wing Tea Party Republicans would by their mere presence admit to the President’s status above them and to his effectiveness. There would also be a salutary effect at the beginning of the negotiations on the debt ceiling. It would curb the ability of the Republicans to appeal to partisan sentiment and indulge in partisan rhetoric, giving the administration more edge. Having members of Congress testify to the reality of the photos will suppress any potential “Deather” movement, that the administration has either fabricated the event or suppressed some aspect of it. (See below for article on the emergence of the “Deather” movement.) This event should be staged over two or three days, occupying most of a work week, and continuing to dominate the public and congressional mind. Don’t let the photos serve as trophies; instead take the Congress as trophy using the photos.”


94 posted on 09/09/2016 11:50:42 AM PDT by CJ Wolf (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Sounds like there’s a decent possibility that some of Hillary’s own people or those hurt by her in the past may have turned against her.

I think so too. Your biggest risk is from pissed-off people on the inside.

95 posted on 09/09/2016 11:56:25 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Oh I like that! Good strategery for sinking the Dems’ ship. Keep them from putting up a more palatable candidate.


96 posted on 09/09/2016 12:01:56 PM PDT by To Hell With Poverty (No one in the field is voting for Frail, Pale and Belongs in Jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

too many pages, too little time


97 posted on 09/09/2016 12:04:23 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaltonNC

http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/264532-mccain-challenged-hillary-to-drinking-contest


98 posted on 09/09/2016 4:30:42 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
"I don’t think revealing a source who is deceased in any way compromises the rest of his sources."

Unless Seth Rich was working with another insider.

99 posted on 09/09/2016 4:35:38 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: glyptol

Haha!!!!


100 posted on 09/09/2016 9:11:03 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson