Posted on 09/08/2016 10:04:06 PM PDT by TigerClaws
now that is a very logical idea...would not surprise me.
I don’t think revealing a source who is deceased in any way compromises the rest of his sources.
*************
There are other considerations such as the impact on his family and close friends. It could put them in an uncomfortable position, if not some jeopardy. Assange has to think of their well being and respect their privacy.
That said, I agree with you it would shine a light on the truth.
I listened to the entire interview with Hannity, and I now have a better level of respect for the guy.
First, I think he goes to great lengths, to not harm national security.
Second, he said a couple on his side, were murdered.
So carefully screening the contents, is important.
(Because Republicans are racists, which they have been called since at least Reagan, and it works. So stick with what works.)
The DNC release, cost Wasserman-Schultz her position. Of course Clinton took her immediately onto the team, and no doubt pays her handsomely even if indirectly.
The public already knows the Clintons lie, but don’t seem to care very much.
The lies must be shown to be deadly, to cost people their lives, without any counter argument.
That might doom Hillary’s campaign. I am not optimistic.
100,000 pages / 60 days = 1666 per day.
Yeah, yeah. More “just wait until you see what we release” hype. I’ll believe it when I see it. Cut the hype and release the docs.
He said he doesn’t want to release before the 26th due to some dem rule that would lock her into the race.
Why doesn’t the guy just come out with it, like now.
Bert, the internet does. The emails are there. I searched “LOL” on the server today after seeing your post, just for kicks. The hilliary files have 5 “lol” emails.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/24428
Japan gets hit with an earthquake, nukes are melting, Hillary has two options. She notes that 2 is a red herring non starter. Unclear if she means go with #1. the aide asks for clarification. Email in return is LOL.
Great leadership. LOL
Well, he called her a "war hawk with bad judgement" who gets an "emotional rush out of killing people". Those things don't seem to bother half of the voting public.
yeah ok...... I’ll concede the point
Really? Do you get your info from Plouffe and Mook?
So I did another search on another word. I feel sick.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/10411
May 5, 2011
“Yes, there is a Third Way—on the Bin Laden photos. Show them to members of Congress in a special secure room, something like when members were permitted to view Abu Ghraib pictures. Here are the reasons: Having the members file through will provide testimony to the President’s feat. They will be not only be acknowledging but also enhancing his power. They will in effect become liegemen bowing before him, but not in any way they will resent or will protest. They will serve as witnesses to the magnitude of what he has done. Each of them will emerge speaking to the national and local press on what they have seen. Their words will be descriptive, but they will not be equivalent to graphic images that could be circulated themselves and have mischievous consequences. Having the whole Congress see the photos would have these likely impacts as well: The far right wing Tea Party Republicans would by their mere presence admit to the President’s status above them and to his effectiveness. There would also be a salutary effect at the beginning of the negotiations on the debt ceiling. It would curb the ability of the Republicans to appeal to partisan sentiment and indulge in partisan rhetoric, giving the administration more edge. Having members of Congress testify to the reality of the photos will suppress any potential “Deather” movement, that the administration has either fabricated the event or suppressed some aspect of it. (See below for article on the emergence of the “Deather” movement.) This event should be staged over two or three days, occupying most of a work week, and continuing to dominate the public and congressional mind. Don’t let the photos serve as trophies; instead take the Congress as trophy using the photos.”
I think so too. Your biggest risk is from pissed-off people on the inside.
Oh I like that! Good strategery for sinking the Dems’ ship. Keep them from putting up a more palatable candidate.
too many pages, too little time
Unless Seth Rich was working with another insider.
Haha!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.