Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2016 1:04:37 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: servo1969

Self-defense is ALWAYS a valid excuse

If my vehicle is surrounded, I am driving over them

I have a nice big Dodge Ram 2500 with a lift kit. I won’t even need to scrape any nasty bits out of my undercarriage


2 posted on 09/22/2016 1:06:39 PM PDT by Mr. K (<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/1adpjl"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/1adpjl.jpg" title="made at im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

“Your honor, I remembered Reginald Denney and I was in fear of my life”....


3 posted on 09/22/2016 1:07:20 PM PDT by Kozak (ALLAH AKBAR = HEIL HITLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I would run them over, and the drop it into reverse!


4 posted on 09/22/2016 1:07:24 PM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

They defense is that you were in fear of your life. Works in every state I know of.


5 posted on 09/22/2016 1:07:32 PM PDT by WENDLE (At the polls -- WEAR RED ! They can't stop us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

If surrounded by a pack of looting thugs, I’ll put the pedal to the metal and let the chips fall where they may.


7 posted on 09/22/2016 1:09:58 PM PDT by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I like the Flamethrower under each door idea


9 posted on 09/22/2016 1:10:57 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Thank you, very interesting and hopefully never useful information.


10 posted on 09/22/2016 1:11:40 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Better to be tried by 12 peers instead of carried to your grave by 6 pall bearers.


11 posted on 09/22/2016 1:12:21 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (I'm a Crude Populist & Deplorable Trump supporter since July 2015! I will proudly vote for Trump!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Goes without saying. Always better to be judged by nine instead of carried by six.


12 posted on 09/22/2016 1:12:23 PM PDT by ZULU (Where the HELL ARE PAUL RYAN AND MITCH MCCONNELL ?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
"Blockaded" is not the same as "surrounded." A single person blocking one's way is not a deadly threat by itself.

Proceeding intently along the roadway is not "running them down." Changing direction to target someone is running someone down.

-PJ

13 posted on 09/22/2016 1:14:55 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Reginald Denny is an object lesson and historical precedent here


14 posted on 09/22/2016 1:14:58 PM PDT by rdcbn ("There is no means of avoiding a final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Jays

The trick is likely to be driving fast in the first place to decrease chance of being stopped.
That is why American convoys drive so fast in hostile areas.

If one knows there are riots occurring in the surrounding areas on both sides of the highway, it would make sense to increase speeds to 80-85 mph and keep moving.
The sole challenge is if rioters begin to block the roadway with stolen trucks and carjacked vehicles of their own to prevent passage. That is when one must think outside the box.


15 posted on 09/22/2016 1:15:02 PM PDT by Blue Jays
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Preventing someone from having freedom of movement is kidnapping. Use of deadly force is always justified against attempted kidnapping, because that is a “forcible felony”, just like rape and murder.


17 posted on 09/22/2016 1:16:09 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

criminal gangs have no right to surround your vehicle, it involves threat, meanace, and raises probable hostage-taking and kidnapping charges, etc

i cant give any legal advice of course, but if they try it on me, I will ask them to let me leave and then if they keep me imprisoned i will tell them i intend to leave by shifting into gear and pressing my gas pedal. if they don’t clear a path they will get hit, period.

to hell with the thugs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if they want to call the police, fine and dandy i will deal with that when and if the time comes. meanwhile, they WILL I PROMISE YOU not imprison me on the public way

to HELL with the thugs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(and if people drive thru them ,, they’re still DAMned lucky folks don’t just blow their brains out)


19 posted on 09/22/2016 1:17:04 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

In Kentucky it is. All you have to say is, “That video of Reginald Denny kept going through my mind.”

In Kentucky, if you fear for loss of life or great bodily harm, it is legal to use lethal force.

We just had a case where a guy was the aggressor in a road rage case, but he was only verbal. The other guy then came at him with a baseball bat, at which point he shot the guy with the bat dead. He was found not guilty. He feared for his life of great bodily harm (one whack with a bat can kill you), justifying his use of deadly force. Who started it is not germane. It’s who escalated it that matters.


21 posted on 09/22/2016 1:17:39 PM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

They surrounded my car and were screaming at me and beating on my car. I was afraid for my life. I would like to speak to my lawyer, please.


22 posted on 09/22/2016 1:17:49 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The problem is that once they come at you, it may be too late. They could be milling around, no threat at all...then 3 seconds later your window is crashed and your skull next.


23 posted on 09/22/2016 1:18:06 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Reginald Denny would have been better off had he kept on truck’n.


24 posted on 09/22/2016 1:18:53 PM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

A reasonably slow steady drive forward is good. They cannot resist it, and will quickly fall away. It would also demonstrate that you did not have the goal of causing harm to them...only to escape.


25 posted on 09/22/2016 1:19:32 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Coming to a dead stop in the middle of an ambush is a really bad idea. It’s the worst possible thing you can do in fact. US military doctrine is pretty consistent on this.


26 posted on 09/22/2016 1:20:55 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson