Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants

They way I understand it, is they want to ban assault weapons because they are the easiest ones used to convince people. That would be the first ban. The NFA in 1934 didn’t ban weapons, it regulated them. Once assault weapons are banned, and the ban holds up, then it’s just a matter of expanding the list to add more guns until eventually they are all banned.


3 posted on 10/03/2016 4:59:53 PM PDT by mikeandike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mikeandike
Well, in fairness, it is because they are the most "lethal" and effective in a combat scenario, such as one might encounter in a civil unrest or armed resistance situation.

There's a reason special ops forces use M4 carbine or other equivalent "assault rifles" instead of Winchester 70s, lever action marlins, or even M1 garands.

19 posted on 10/03/2016 6:19:35 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson