To: kimtom
President Trump can cancel - or simply neutralise by non-enforcement - any treaty or deal he wants.
To: canuck_conservative
The UN can go pound sand. Trump should withdraw all funding and revolk diplomatic credentials for UN diplomats
4 posted on
10/06/2016 3:40:32 AM PDT by
Fai Mao
(PIAPS for Prison 2016)
To: canuck_conservative
The Constitution requires that the Senate is the only body that binds the United States to a treaty. Other than that, forget it.
15 posted on
10/06/2016 4:02:04 AM PDT by
odawg
To: canuck_conservative
uh, yeah..of course.
This is the dumbest ###ing thing i’ve ever read.
cutting by that emissions (while China doesn’t have to start until we’re done in 2025) will cripple us.
Trump will tell them to drop dead.
22 posted on
10/06/2016 4:23:11 AM PDT by
dp0622
(IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: canuck_conservative
Trump should bomb the UN to dust, then build a nice golf course and the new Trump International Hotel, Turtle Bay.
LMAO!!!
26 posted on
10/06/2016 5:13:32 AM PDT by
Gargantua
("President Trump... nice ring to it..." ;^)
To: canuck_conservative
Without 2/3 of Senators ratifying this agreement, it is not binding. Who died and left Obozo God to unilaterally bind the US to international agreements?
The UN and the European Union are both menaces to American interests. The sooner that both disappear the better. Kick the UN out of the US and seize its aging HQ in New York by eminent domain or just seize it as an exercise in American sovereignty.
29 posted on
10/06/2016 5:25:02 AM PDT by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Rack 'em, Danno!)
To: canuck_conservative
President Trump can cancel - or simply neutralise by non-enforcement - any treaty or deal he wants. ^^^ This
40 posted on
10/06/2016 7:08:41 AM PDT by
CAluvdubya
(<---has now left CA for NV, where God/guns have not been outlawed! She's done and he's won!)
To: canuck_conservative
Constitutionally he is prohibited from taking any action on a Treaty that has not been approved by the Senate. Too bad the current occupant of the White House disregards that document.
42 posted on
10/06/2016 7:17:08 AM PDT by
henkster
(Better to be Pavlov's Dog than Schroedinger's Cat)
To: canuck_conservative
It’s no -binding anyway, he doesn’t have to give it even a first thought...he can just ignore it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson