Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
I believe you are referring to the naturalization acts of 1790 and 1795. You might be interested in this article for a clear understanding of the issue:

NEW EVIDENCE: Intent of 1790 Naturalization Act

132 posted on 10/12/2016 2:07:03 AM PDT by Godebert (CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Godebert

Talking about the intent of an act now gone is like showing the horse that has fled the barn and has now died in the field and is now a skeleton that even the vultures do not care about.


133 posted on 10/12/2016 3:20:29 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: Godebert

At any rate, the most signal reference point is simply gone. We have a Rorschach test for our jurors now.


134 posted on 10/12/2016 3:21:54 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson