Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Patriot61

I used to work with guys that had security clearance (not sure what level) but I would often hit on areas where they would say “I can’t talk about that,” and would cite their oath to protect that data no matter who they personally trusted. I never took it personally and in fact thought it was pretty cool I would ever come in contact with potentially sensitive information to require someone to inform me of it. I think at a minimum a potential President needs to have that level of respect for secret information.


15 posted on 10/17/2016 3:51:22 PM PDT by siberianheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: siberianheat

This is one of the downsides to having a civilian as commander in chief.

I would personally prefer that a candidate would have to have served in the military prior to running for the office.

That would be no panacea, but at least then a person would actually understand taking as well as giving orders, and would understand the necessity and importance of classified materials.


19 posted on 10/17/2016 4:16:42 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: siberianheat

It can also be the case where these peeps were subject to random polygraphs to ensure their silence about the job. I know.


23 posted on 10/17/2016 5:41:27 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson