Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BJ1
It represents 1) The lack of better candidates. 2) It shows the moral decay that despite Trump’s character flaws, the electorate chose him.

Who was a better candidate?

I also think you're entirely wrong. Trump is by far THE BEST candidate for a time such as now. Flaws and all.

Btw, who was the last "unflawed"candidate you can name?

88 posted on 10/19/2016 3:25:22 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Trump. He stands for the great issues of the day. He's not Hillary. I love both these things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

The sleaze factor with Trump is just there. In that way he is more flawed than all the other candidates he ran against in the primary. The fact that the vulgarity from Trump wasn’t a major impediment to his popularity is evidence of the moral rot in the country.

He was the only candidate willing to give the democrats what they dish out. So maybe he is the best candidate in terms of winning the general: Time will tell on that point. But he was not the best in terms of moral character.


102 posted on 10/19/2016 8:01:56 PM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson