http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-16/leaked-list-hillary-clintons-mega-donors
Jun 16, 2016
Posted on 10/23/2016 5:23:06 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
This is an empty email but the Excel file is an attachment.
Names include
Chelsea Handler - $100,000
Morgan Freeman - $1M
George Soros - $1M
Steven Spielberg - $1.1M
Jeffrey Katzenberg - $3M
Bill Maher - $ 1M
Also see
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22650
From:jennifer@jennifergranholm.com
To: sfxsweeney@msn.com
Date: 2014-01-04 14:40
Subject: Re: Jennifer
Great. Talk to you then. 517-515-3990. I assume you will initiate?
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 4, 2014, at 8:37 AM, "Sean Sweeney " wrote:
> How is tomorrow at 2p.m. EST?
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jennifer M. Granholm"
> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:34:37
> To:
> Cc: ; ;
> Subject: Re: Jennifer
>
>
> Thanks John.
> Charlie, Sean and Jim:
> Specifically, I am in the final stages of agreeing to direct a new initiative at UC Berkeley called The American Jobs Project, which is to guide a 50-state in-depth dive on breakthrough/disruptive jobs policies and economic cluster proposals for the states, starting with the energy sector, for the purpose of attracting middle class jobs to America while competing in a global economy. While I will be guiding graduate students in the research, it is a big project. I'm very hopeful (and expect that) the results will be useful to HRC.
> That being said, I'm totally devoted to our cause and want very much to make this commitment. I just need to evaluate whether I can do both (in addition to other stuff on the plate). A conversation would be terrific. I'm free this afternoon (Pacific time) and all day tomorrow.
> Thanks --
> JMG
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 4, 2014, at 7:54 AM, "John Podesta" wrote:
>
>> I had a good conversation with Jennifer yesterday about Priorities. She's reflecting on her capacity to make the commitment and wants to have further conversations about time obligation.
>>
>> Sean, would appreciate if you could take the initiative in setting up a call for you three soon to follow up.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> JP
The part in red means the Hillary campaign at the highest levels (Podesta, Jennifer Granholm) were explicitly coordinating with the SuperPac. Note 'Priorities' is capitalized, and the name of the SuperPac is 'Priorities USA Action'. Jennifer Granholm, was drafted to be co-chair of this superPAC by Hillary's campaign manager (Podesta) and -guess what- Jennifer Granholm is now chair of CORRECT THE RECORD (that David Brock organization which has a regular list of talking heads and daily email press summaries, as well as 15,000 paid internet trolls).
This sounds to *me* like a layperson, that it might be illegal -- aren't SuperPACs *forbidden* to coordinate with the campaign?
Check it out, folks.
*PING* to Clinton SuperPAC details.
So what?
They are lawless and none will be charged, much less punished.
If there is no law, then there is no law.
they are thus not protected by laws against harm to their person
[They are lawless and none will be charged, much less punished.]
until DONALD TRUMP is POTUS.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-16/leaked-list-hillary-clintons-mega-donors
Jun 16, 2016
Wow.... there it is. A political hit list prioritized by amounts of dollars contributed
Outlaws.
Bttt
Bill Maher denies donation to Hillary PAC:
HT: reddit
Here’s the clip in question queued to 03:35, the beginning of the exchange.
https://youtu.be/5-EJAIXdGp8?t=215
David Brock has 7 non-profits, 3 Super PACs, one 527-committee, one LLC, one joint fundraising committee, and one unregistered solicitor crammed into his office in Washington DC. Uncovered records expose a constant flow of money between these organizations. The Bonner Group, his professional solicitor, works off a commission. Every time money gets passed around, Bonner receives a 12.5% cut.
Follow the money : Say, for example, you donate $1,062,857 to Media Matters for America. This is how David Brock would have used your charitable donation in 2014:
1- Media Matters would receive your $1,062,857 donation The Bonner Group would earn a $132,857 commission Media Matters would retain $930,000
2- Next, Media Matters would give what’s left of your entire donation, $930,000, to the Franklin Education Forum The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $116,250 commission The Franklin Education Forum would retain $813,750
3- The Franklin Education Forum would then forward the remaining $813,750 to The Franklin Forum The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $101,718 commission The Franklin Forum would retain $712,031
In the end, Brock’s solicitor would have pocketed $350,825, almost a third of your initial donation! That’s a far cry from the advertised 12.5% commission.
more at zerohedge.com
Brock's little nest was one of the first things I thought of, but I wasn't aware of any succinct summary.
Could you post that item as a separate thread, please?
I am not sure what a super PAC is or exactly how it works or what is illegal. Can somebody explain?
I believe that’s posted as a separate thread.....but may try to do so at a later date.
I don’t know very well. But what I think I understand is that coordination between super PACs and campaigns themselves (which is what the spreadsheet is evidence of) is forbidden, because there is no limit on individual donations to super PACs.
PING
Do you know who else used that methodology or one kind of like it? Bill and Hillary Clinton in the Whitewater deal which became the gold standard for the criminality for the theft that occurred during the S&L crisis.
The S&L would loan money to it’s insider #1 to buy property A. The insider would take property A, have a crooked appraiser in on the scam say that property A was now worth twice as much and the same S&L would loan twice the money to insider #2 to buy the property from insider #1. They would keep doing this and at the end the American taxpayer was left holding the bag.
John McCain was in on this kind of theft and THAT SOB ran for president. He is a crook and a nut case, I’ve met him. But I digress.
Most people in Washington are outright thieves. Even the Bush family are. In this election cycle they are pissed off because Trump screwed up their bundling gravy train. Just like in the David Brock money laundering scheme people like Neil Bush would get a commission on every dollar raised for the Jeb! campaign or many of the Super Pac’s. But Donald Trump came along and screwed the entire Bush family because he cut off their commission based fund raising way before the general election. People like Neil Bush tried to pivot over to another Bush lackey named Ted Cruz but that went to hell too once Trump took Ted Cruz out.
It is all about money and this election cycle Donald John Trump totally destroyed the Republican money gravy train. Trust me, believe me, he knew that would happen.
When Trump is elected a lot of people will be going to jail or losing a lot or all of their money. That is why all of those on the left are crapping in their pants, they have to win or they go to the pokey or go broke. The Clinton’s know this and they and many others are scared $hitless. I pray for Trump’s safety.
BEST ELECTION EVER!!!!!
Thanks for pinging me to my own thread. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.