To: outpostinmass2
Yeah, the threat of perjury charges will have that affect. Maybe it should be a crime to lie to a reporter too.
2 posted on
10/26/2016 7:57:16 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: outpostinmass2
doesn’t anyone at Rolling Stone just have a first name and last name?
3 posted on
10/26/2016 7:59:21 AM PDT by
dp0622
(IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: outpostinmass2
Note the 'at random' simile from our
unbiased news media;On the tape, she sniffs like Donald Trump at a debate.
4 posted on
10/26/2016 8:02:55 AM PDT by
SES1066
(Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
To: outpostinmass2
Yes, she becomes a shell while talking to the legal system not so much to the press. I read she never filed a police report because she would then be filing a false one.
7 posted on
10/26/2016 8:34:22 AM PDT by
bjorn14
(Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
To: outpostinmass2
Hillary & Co. - a mantra of her own: I dont remember"
8 posted on
10/26/2016 8:36:11 AM PDT by
stocksthatgoup
(When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
To: outpostinmass2
Since she is not a real rape victim, there is no reason to shield this slanderer's identity. The liar is named Jackie Coakley. Here is a photograph, should anyone want to avoid dealings with her:
9 posted on
10/26/2016 8:38:58 AM PDT by
Boogieman
To: outpostinmass2
I notice she didn’t use ‘I can’t recall’ and avoided infringing on Hillary’s trademarked response to avoiding perjury charges...
10 posted on
10/26/2016 8:48:43 AM PDT by
Geronimo
(Voting for Hillary is the political equivalent of coprophagia...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson