Posted on 10/29/2016 9:49:00 AM PDT by mandaladon
Turns out the Clintons have been right all along: Lying really does work. Poring through all these purloined emails, you get the sense that these people spend every breathing second of their day either lying, plotting to tell lies or lying about lies they told in the past.
And each batch of stolen emails is worse than the last.
Hillary Clinton is a liar. She has terrible instincts. She doesn’t believe in anything. Her head is broken. She doesn’t know why she should be president. She is pathological. And she is psychotic.
Just ask everybody who works for her. Just ask campaign chairman John Podesta. Just ask the people working the hardest to get her elected president.
I mean, in her most rabid streak of attacks on Donald Trump’s alleged unfitness for office, Mrs. Clinton doesn’t call him “psychotic.”
Psychotic! That is what her campaign chairman called her.
Remember back when President Bill Clinton got into all that trouble molesting the young intern in his Oral Office? Remember the first thing the lying, conniving, dissembling commander-in-cheek did?
Take a poll. And he found out that he could skate by on even this — even this! But first — the poll told him — he had to stall for time. He had to lie about it for as long as he possibly could before coming clean.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
No we're not God. But few people get as deranged as Stalin Hitler, Mao, or Hillary. And with modern weapons, such a person could kill a billion people before they could be stopped - IF they could be stopped.
So the question isn't what about the 10th person, but what about the risk to a billion people, or all of humanity?
And God has revealed genetic science to humanity. Or other forms of knowledge that might be relevant.
I'm just saying that such decisions are made all the time, and it's best to avoid having to make them in a desperate situation. I can't answer for why God made things this way, but He did. And we have to deal with it. Denying it as an option sends millions to their deaths - history has proven it time and again, and Hillary is right in front of us, literally. If she wins, America actually, really dies. There will be would war. She really is that insane. Millions will die.
If the human race ever rises again after that, I guarantee the 10th baby won't matter a bit.
I can imagine that some out there would seek a "marker" for a conservative outlook. They'd reason that it would be best to murder babies by the scores to prevent a Reagan or a von Mises or a Goldwater or a Jefferson or anyone else who may be genetically predisposed to lead a life with a philosophy counter to their own.
What a dismal and bleak vision of the world to use genetics to cull the herd of undesirables.
That is the world vision Margaret Sanger had.
The condescension was in your refusing to admit the concept. I just pointed it out.
Thanks for your honesty.
I would bet money that if she were evaluated by a psychiatrist she’d be diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder with sociopathic traits.
.
Except when there is no desire to grasp.
.
The modern world is a creation based on precise language. The language comes first. "Undesirables" is imprecise language. It can mean "Jews" to Nazis in 1944, it can mean Muslim jihadi immigrants in 2016, it can mean babies with genetic markers for any number of problems, it can mean drunks after midnight outside of a pizza parlor.
I am talking about a specific, highly dangerous type of person. After all, even among criminals, Hillary is unique. We know genetics is linked to brain problems in many cases. It is therefore not unlikely that we will someday be able to find genetic markers for mass murderous psychopathy, the same way we now note genetic markers for violent criminals, or behavior data for times and places for enhanced policing requirements, or screening tests for learning aptitudes.
What we do with the information need not be grim. But I would hardly call preventing a mass murderer, a warmongering psychopath, from rising to power, "grim." I would more see such a thing as a gift from God - of mercy.
Except that I would define such people by their ferocious, burning desire to grasp. An inhuman compulsion, in fact. I see that as Hillary's defining characteristic.
Interestingly, it's also a developmental state. What if, psychologically, she's stuck at one year old, or two. Where grasping is given 100% attention, and raw rage is the result of being denied. And what if that was detectable, genetically or otherwise? I find such thoughts extremely interesting.
Many helpful things are developed through musings. Read up on the development of radar, for example.
Surely you are not advocating either forcible abortion or forced sterilization, are you? Based upon genetic testing? Would it be desirable, as well, to terminate a child after the child is born? Do we lock them up for having a genetic predisposition to whatever actions they may commit? Guilty without a trial?
Unbelievable.
Yes, Hillary Clinton is MORE dangerous than Elizabeth Warren. Because the former is a liar and a hypocrite who says one thing in public and opposite in private. The latter on the other hand in consistently leftist.
First, such genetic test is not even close to being reality. Therefore we are dealing with hypothetical and abstract. Also note that most violent criminals are result of life experiences. Very few are born criminals.
For further hypothettical discussion, let us forward the clock a few decades, and such genetic test is discoveered and proven by real life testing. Then the question should be answered by the general public who can determine if they are willing to tolerate 90% chance violent criminal in their midst. In any democratic republic no distinct minority whould prevail over predominant majority. Otherwise it is a slippery slope to autocracy and dictatorship.
The abortion of neonatal infants is the destruction of innocents. Better to put Hillary and her crew before a firing squad or a public hanging. Those would be fitting justice for her manifold crimes.
There is noting theoretical about abortion as it is practiced against infants. The very fact of birth and infancy assumes a purity that only becomes despoiled with the influence of evil.
That Hillary was once an innocent baby is absolutely true. That she has become a horrid and fearsome harridan is equally true.
Would I have agreed to Hillary’s abortion? Certainly not. Any more than I support the 50 million innocent babies who have been slaughtered.
We cannot know at the moment of birth the direction of a person’s life.
I would submit to you that the notion of innocent until proven guilty is the best course we humans have developed thus far. I refuse to play God and usurp what is His domain.
.
I agree fully WRT Hillary’s Lusts.
.
We cannot know at the moment of birth the direction of a person’s life. And if we could we must not.
OK, then what is your thinking on death sentences? Does God give humans the right to kill any human being convicted in a human court? Shouldn’t God be the ultimate Jury & executioner? To be consistent, are you against death penalty for convicted criminals?
All of your objections are based upon the idea that adequate technology doesn’t yet exist, and, AFAIK, you’re right.
But you’re wrong to imagine me unhinged. I’m furious that we are so close to being exterminated by some insane hag who’s managed to game and corrupt the system this far. History proves the reality of what a creature like this murderous bitch will do if she can.
Compared to that ocean of suffering and blood, yes I would abort a future Hillary if I could. And if that means I went to hell forever, because God wanted all those hundreds of millions or billions of people to be vaporized by nukes or die in rape or slave camps, then I’d spit in His face and go to hell.
Everyone has to draw their own line.
What kind of sick ____ are you?
We have nothing further to discuss. It would be best for you to make yourself scarce and go commiserate with those better suited to your sick philosophy.
So you believe human beings have the right to be the judge, jury and executioner of another human being? I thought that was up to God to judge our sins. Also, where did you read in my post that I am personally OK in killing any one and that of course includes the living fetus? Killing a defenseless fetus is far worse than any other form of killing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.