Posted on 10/29/2016 9:49:00 AM PDT by mandaladon
Turns out the Clintons have been right all along: Lying really does work. Poring through all these purloined emails, you get the sense that these people spend every breathing second of their day either lying, plotting to tell lies or lying about lies they told in the past.
And each batch of stolen emails is worse than the last.
Hillary Clinton is a liar. She has terrible instincts. She doesn’t believe in anything. Her head is broken. She doesn’t know why she should be president. She is pathological. And she is psychotic.
Just ask everybody who works for her. Just ask campaign chairman John Podesta. Just ask the people working the hardest to get her elected president.
I mean, in her most rabid streak of attacks on Donald Trump’s alleged unfitness for office, Mrs. Clinton doesn’t call him “psychotic.”
Psychotic! That is what her campaign chairman called her.
Remember back when President Bill Clinton got into all that trouble molesting the young intern in his Oral Office? Remember the first thing the lying, conniving, dissembling commander-in-cheek did?
Take a poll. And he found out that he could skate by on even this — even this! But first — the poll told him — he had to stall for time. He had to lie about it for as long as he possibly could before coming clean.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
No, but we can make metaphors about it towards a murderous tyrant without being lectured about it by obsessive compulsive literalist Sunday School teachers.
What a sheltered, comfy and pure life you lead.
Lucky you.
And how much horror do we allow them to accomplish before we destroy them? This is, for sane people, a theoretical discussion. And with the advances in technology, perhaps in our future, a practical one.
You can, but you shouldn't. FYI, it wasn't a metaphor.
Absolutely, the sooner the better.
Time magazine and The New York Times: scumbags.
Puke.
Legalistically? If that is a word. I suppose that one must first commit the crimes before doing the times. Guilt before an act of crime is untenable. What we know now we certainly could not have know before. Who among us is clairvoyant? Who among us can look at a pregnant woman and say: “She will birth a Hitler”? That is a conundrum. There is no answer that we humans have access to.
Nothing is always anything except to children. See my post #75. Situational ethics is not created by context, it's created by not having a fundamental truth to apply to the situation in the first place. Context is always required, there's no getting around it. We are not machines.
“She is beyond Psychotic...she should have been aborted!!! “
What does abortion have to do with it. Can we look at a baby’s face and decide they are going to grow up to be aggressive psychopaths?
We all want Hilary out of politics. But to suggest she should have been murdered as an infant makes no sense at all.
Why shouldn't we, because you say so? Because the definition of the word metaphor doesn't, in your opinion, meet the linguistic requirements of referencing an imaginary situation enacted before the fact - in other words, you don't accept using the word metaphor metaphorically?
Out is it because you don't want people realizing that the murder of aborted babies is the same as the murder of the victims of Leftists generally, and Hillary specifically?
With the strenuousness of efforts like yours, it's no wonder Hillary gets so many votes.
“If it hadn’t been for the blue dress, he’d still be lying about it.”
True, and that’s because, for most of the electorate, we believe what we WANT to believe. The Dems mostly wanted to believe that he was a feminist. His nasty behavior didn’t fit the script; so they really wanted to pretend it didn’t happen.
So yay for the blue dress. And for the handful of Dems who might have realized they had a phony prophet.
“Thanks Julian!”
JULIAN ASSANGE MAN OF THE YEAR
Unless you can imagine it meaning that it would be better if she'd never been born, so she couldn't do all the damage she's done. Like Hitler, for example. Or Stalin. Or any murderous psychopath.
It's really not a hard concept to grasp.
No, but what if we could genetically?
What if genetic studies show 9 out of 10 babies with a certain generic marker grow up to be murderous psychopaths.
What then?
These enablers have NO morals. Or they are psycho, too.
And people wonder why we want Trump to repair the damage?
” BTW, the only death camps in the USA that might resemble that are abortion clinics. “
Really! Think of all the terrible future people who have probably been killed there. In the twisted line of thinking being bandied about by some here, we should be happy there are abortion clinics peppered around the country.
It is an interesting philosophical question, like, were you alive in 1927 would you have killed young Hitler? But of course we can’t time travel.
I doubt those defending it mean to defend abortion as a whole, but the pre-emptive strike on the unborn meme is a real thing. I had a boss decades ago who thought abortion was wrong but was glad it was legal because it kept the black population down, thus keeping down crime and welfare problems in his opinion. I kid you not.
it’s a real philosophy and probably behind a lot of the country club class sort of being against abortion in name only, but really being glad we have it.
What then?
What of #10? What if #10 would not be a psychopath and would, instead, be another da Vinci or an Einstein or a Tesla? What then? Do we murder out of fears and thereby give way to our animal side? We are human, not God.
I get the concept. No need to be condescending.
Obviously, in the providence of God, she was born. And we all have to deal with it. Properly.
I sure do. The monkey wrench in the whole thing was Obama. Hillary wasn’t supposed to be this old when her turn hit: She was supposed to have hers about 8 years ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.