Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flashback: Clinton cheered 11th hour indictment that doomed Bush re-election
The Washington Examiner ^ | 10/30/2016 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 10/30/2016 7:24:53 AM PDT by KeyLargo

Flashback: Clinton cheered 11th hour indictment that doomed Bush re-election

By Paul Bedard (@SecretsBedard) • 10/30/16 8:16 AM

Whispers of "payback" are being directed at Hillary Clinton after she decried as "unprecedented" the surprise FBI revival of its probe of her email scandal.

That's because 24 years ago, as former President George H.W. Bush was surging back against challenger Bill Clinton, a special prosecutor raised new charges against Bush in the Iran-Contra probe, prompting Clinton to claim he was running against a "culture of corruption."

Many Republicans claimed that the indictment made by special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh against former Reagan-era Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger the weekend before the 1992 election cost Bush a second term. The indictment, later thrown out, challenged Bush's claim that he did not know about a controversial arms-for-hostages deal that dogged the Reagan-Bush administration.

When it came, Clinton seized on it, saying for example, "Secretary Weinberger's note clearly shows that President Bush has not been telling the truth when he says he was out of the loop." Clinton added, "It demonstrates that President Bush knew and approved of President Reagan's secret deal to swap arms for hostages."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: classified; clinton; clintoncash; comey; corruption; fbi; hillary; huma
"The Clintons seized on the new indictment, howling about a "culture of corruption" that supposedly pervaded the administration. Bush's poll numbers declined and Bill Clinton won the election.

Shortly after the election, a federal judge threw out the new indictment because it violated the five-year statute of limitations and improperly broadened the original charges. President Bush then pardoned Weinberger.

Keep this history in mind during the coming days when you hear Democratic hacks talking about how awful it is for law enforcement officials and/or prosecutors to "interfere" in the presidential election process."

1 posted on 10/30/2016 7:24:53 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Wasn’t there also something like this regarding Senator Stevens of Alaska?


2 posted on 10/30/2016 7:26:20 AM PDT by Mercat (Men never do evil so fully and cheerfully as when they do it out of conscience.” (Blaise Pascal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I remember that. Lawrence Walsh-Republican. I knew then everything was rigged and politically motivated. Somewhere down the road it was ‘Republican business interests’ that favored a Harry Reid reelection for the Senate.


3 posted on 10/30/2016 7:27:52 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

The Klinton Kulture of Korruption. Let them eat their own words.


4 posted on 10/30/2016 7:36:38 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

That indictment of Bush was the FIRST THING that came to mind when this happened. Like it or not, if you’re under investigation while campaigning, there is ALWAYS a possibility of something like this happening, particularly if you are as corrupt as Clinton.


5 posted on 10/30/2016 7:37:01 AM PDT by BobL (If Hillary wins, there WILL NOT be another contested election, for decades - think AMNESTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

What I have never understood, over the past year, is: WHY have Republicans not DEMANDED a Special Prosecutor for this case... a LONG TIME ago.

Obama himself is hip deep in this whole mess. There is NO WAY the Justice Dept can do a fair investigation. If ever there was a case needing a Special Prosecutor, it was this one.


6 posted on 10/30/2016 7:45:43 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Yes. The entire prosecution against Stevens was a made up fraud.

It is well documented, but only after Stevens lost the election. Stevens died shortly thereafter.

All under the Obama administration.


7 posted on 10/30/2016 7:46:12 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

WHY have Republicans not DEMANDED a Special Prosecutor for this case... a LONG TIME ago.


Because Obama is black, most of the Republican leadership are RINO progressives, and all are terrified of the media.


8 posted on 10/30/2016 7:47:37 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

If somebody just had video of Hillary acting all indignant about Walsh’s indictment! It would be priceless.


9 posted on 10/30/2016 7:48:00 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Spineless? Complicit? Take your pick.


10 posted on 10/30/2016 7:48:33 AM PDT by Typelouder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Wow, the real LAW OF RETRIBUTION at work, and no one is even noticing. The HAND OF THE LORD is in all of this.


11 posted on 10/30/2016 7:53:28 AM PDT by rovenstinez (so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Interesting that the Bush’s side with the Klintons now on this election so I guess all is forgiven from their persective


12 posted on 10/30/2016 8:09:34 AM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

WHY have Republicans not DEMANDED a Special Prosecutor for this case... a LONG TIME ago.

Because Obama is black, most of the Republican leadership are RINO progressives, and all are terrified of the media.



I think because EVERYONE knows that this will involve the whole administration, and require arresting everyone within the beltway. Including Obama.

They just don’t have the guts for that.

More than that,,, they are cowards!


13 posted on 10/30/2016 9:19:25 AM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Well, yes.... there’s always that.


14 posted on 10/30/2016 10:53:37 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Bttt


15 posted on 10/30/2016 1:45:17 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

This needs to saturate Twitter for the next week.

It’s OK with Hillar if this occurs four days before an election if it helps her get into the White House.

It’s not OK with Hillary if it occurs 11 days before an election if it might prevent her from getting into the White House.


16 posted on 10/30/2016 1:49:19 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson