Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

Really cool.


3 posted on 10/31/2016 3:57:51 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beaversmom
Doctors at the University of California Los Angeles are awaiting permission from US regulators to connect the system to a camera, worn in a pair of glasses, which they hope will send moving images directly to the brain.


12 posted on 10/31/2016 5:00:48 AM PDT by Flick Lives (Voting Trump. It is not just a vote, it is a chance to burn down the rotten Uniparty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: beaversmom

Experiments from years ago showed similar results. People have been able to “see” through their tongues and the skin on their backs. The brain doesn’t require an “eye” to see. It just requires the input from the eye. If you can produce that input (from a camera, for example), and get it the signal to the visual part of the brain (via nerves on your back or tongue, for example), your brain will see.

Someone who has previously been able to see but has lost the ability already has the neurons in place to process visual information. Someone who has never had sight, might not be able to see, or at the very least would have to “learn” to process the visual information. Most of us learn to do that during infancy.


17 posted on 10/31/2016 6:50:50 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson