From the end of the article- “What the scientists amassed wasn’t a smoking gun. It’s a suggestive body of evidence that doesn’t absolutely preclude alternative explanations.” It’s nonsense and Hillary relied on it like a kook.
Yes, that’s why I included that final paragraph. Even Slate knows they must shield themselves from the manure they are shoveling in case they end up in court.
Finally, a new one to add to the list of rhetorical fallacies. We asked a question, we provided an unreadably long discussion of ins and outs of DNS tables, and in the end we conclude, well that we cannot conclude much of anything except that we are the dullest grad-grinds ever employed in the pursuit of a bootless quest that ever existed.
The reason these Tea Leaves don't want their names known (and some folks on the dark web are working on that) is that they will be known as idiots.