Posted on 11/01/2016 2:49:08 AM PDT by FlyingFish
[Even the “lauded” IBD is still trying to drag her across the line.]
Of course, they were anti-Trump back in the spring. We haven’t forgotten.
Pointing out the facts on vote fraud are not "hysteria." Trump has highlighted and spoken of these exact facts during campaign speeches.
Moreover, you have exhibited, through your choice of language, a grandiose sense of entitlement that anyone you disagree with gives you the right to treat others like jerks. You are entitled to be a jerk yourself, but you are not entitled to your own private echo chamber here. Your demeanor gives you a bad name.
The language I used was reflective of your own cringing negativity.
Trump is going to win with more then 5% of the vote, so fraud won't steal the election.
Do us all a favor, stop posting until after the election, you clearly don't have the heart for it.
I have seen quite a few polls that have Trump ahead and yet you are nowhere to be seen.
Because there's a yuuuuge difference between answering a phone call from a pollster, and actually showing up at the voting booth and pulling the lever for someone who's obviously a criminal; someone who has used government to enrich themselves; someone who engages in transparent graft on a systematic and routine basis.
It's quite simple: if this corrupt bitch is elected President, it is our Patriotic duty as Americans to become avowed Revolutionaries. Not subtly, behind the scenes, but openly and fiercely.
There is no doubt in my mind that the Founders would easily conclude that the threshold has been crossed, to wit: "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce [the People] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government". Essentially, it would trivially be the case that the time for Revolution has come, should someone as transparently corrupt as Hillary Clinton be elected to the Presidency.
The instance of the sex of the President-elect, of course, has absolutely no bearing on this issue.
Objectively, applying the standards that the Founders delineated, there would be absolutely no question that the threshold stated in the Declaration will have been crossed.
Thus, it no longer becomes a debate regarding Right, but of Duty to throw off such Government, notwithstanding the trappings of Democratic process under which such usurpation might have occurred.
Indeed, I would consider myself a coward to adopt any other course of action. I'm not saying that such a movement would have to occur instantly or thoughtlessly, but I am saying that tolerance for such Tyrannical usurpation would, IMHO, constitute an abject betrayal of the Declaration of Independence (of which my G-G-G-G-G-G-G-Grandfather, John Hart of New Jersey, was a Signer) as well as the Constitution which was adopted on June 21, 1788.
To be legitimate, such Resistance must necessarily be carried out by more than one lone individual, but there would be absolutely no question in my mind regarding the validity of collective Resistance, notwithstanding the bleating of those forces who would prefer to shamefully capitulate to such overt Tyranny.
The Revolution is ON!
Vote Trump!
The biggest rumor out there are the supposid Soros voting machines.
Comment?
What this means is that the election is within the margin for winning by fraud.
National polls are meaningless. Fraud capability in precisely the right voting precincts is the only meaningful data
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.