Hillary is in full meltdown mode, by the way:
Where is Huma?
Yet this poll still has her up by a point. How can that be with such decisive independent support for trump?
If you make your sample D+7% and make sure that the I is a very small proportion (27%) they can fix it.
:-(
Hillary is in full meltdown mode, by the way:
Where is Huma?
D+7, Indies only 27%.
I haven’t seen the cross tabs on other demos, but they bury bias by over sampling other groups favorable to Marxists - minorities, women, college grads, etc.
Because there's a yuuuuge difference between answering a phone call from a pollster, and actually showing up at the voting booth and pulling the lever for someone who's obviously a criminal; someone who has used government to enrich themselves; someone who engages in transparent graft on a systematic and routine basis.
It's quite simple: if this corrupt bitch is elected President, it is our Patriotic duty as Americans to become avowed Revolutionaries. Not subtly, behind the scenes, but openly and fiercely.
There is no doubt in my mind that the Founders would easily conclude that the threshold has been crossed, to wit: "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce [the People] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government". Essentially, it would trivially be the case that the time for Revolution has come, should someone as transparently corrupt as Hillary Clinton be elected to the Presidency.
The instance of the sex of the President-elect, of course, has absolutely no bearing on this issue.
Objectively, applying the standards that the Founders delineated, there would be absolutely no question that the threshold stated in the Declaration will have been crossed.
Thus, it no longer becomes a debate regarding Right, but of Duty to throw off such Government, notwithstanding the trappings of Democratic process under which such usurpation might have occurred.
Indeed, I would consider myself a coward to adopt any other course of action. I'm not saying that such a movement would have to occur instantly or thoughtlessly, but I am saying that tolerance for such Tyrannical usurpation would, IMHO, constitute an abject betrayal of the Declaration of Independence (of which my G-G-G-G-G-G-G-Grandfather, John Hart of New Jersey, was a Signer) as well as the Constitution which was adopted on June 21, 1788.
To be legitimate, such Resistance must necessarily be carried out by more than one lone individual, but there would be absolutely no question in my mind regarding the validity of collective Resistance, notwithstanding the bleating of those forces who would prefer to shamefully capitulate to such overt Tyranny.
The Revolution is ON!
Vote Trump!