The people did indeed vote. What the people did not do, however, is authorise the Government to implement that vote in whatever manner it chooses without any further reference back to the sovereign Parliament. And since the core purpos of Brexit is to reassert the sovereignty of the British Parliament without subjection to a foreign body, the judgment of the court is reinforcing the people’s will, not contradicting it. Naturalman has explained this lucidly on earlier posts in this thread.
Thank you for the mention.
Not knowing precisely how the British system works, I’ll concede on the point.
I do not like to see judges jumping into political issues.