Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confirmed: Hillary Declaration under oath in Judicial Watch case was deceptive
© Copyright 2008-2016, Legal Insurrection, All Rights Reserved. ^ | Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 1:30pm | Posted by William A. Jacobson

Posted on 11/03/2016 4:40:23 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

On the same day Hillary Clinton swore to a judge that she believed all of her State Department emails had been turned over in a federal lawsuit, her private attorney wrote to the presidential candidate’s inner circle acknowledging the possible existence of additional messages that had not yet been produced, according to a leaked email message....

The Declaration under oath was a clear deception, as it didn’t reveal the concern Kendall had expressed about documents prior to March 18, 2009 that had not been produced. Whether it was perjury will depend on whether a prosecutor or court would accept the numerous Clintonian loopholes built into the wording.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200903; 20090318; clinton; coverup; deceptive; destruction; elections; email; highcrimes; hillary; lying; obstruction; perjury; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2016 4:40:23 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Nah, she said she turned over “EV-reething” with a distinct emphasis on “EV”.

No way Lyin’ Hillary was lyin’.


2 posted on 11/03/2016 4:44:59 PM PDT by chris37 (It's time to burn the GOP down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Perjury is a way of life in the Clinton Crime Family


3 posted on 11/03/2016 4:45:31 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

4 posted on 11/03/2016 4:45:32 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

5 posted on 11/03/2016 4:46:56 PM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Related to this—?

State Dept. Emails: Clinton White House Data Stolen from National Archives


6 posted on 11/03/2016 4:48:19 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I am now at the point, where I understand why the Blosheviks executed the entire Romanov family.

This woman, her husband, their daughter, her husband, and their grand daughter all need to receive the same treatment. We can add to them Huma, Carlos Danger, Cheryl Mills,John Podesta, Soros, and a litany of other miscreants who have enabled/served them in any capacity. Execute them all. Preferably in a ditch somewhere covered with lime, and back-filled.


7 posted on 11/03/2016 4:52:55 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
“Deceptive” is a pretty squishy word...either it was perjury or it wasn't.
8 posted on 11/03/2016 4:53:54 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Note to DJT:

One of your surrogates should say, “Hey, ho! You ain’ no Margaret Thatcher!”


9 posted on 11/03/2016 5:05:15 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Note to all foreigners: Please.....GET OUT and STAY OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

“I am now at the point, where I understand why the Bolsheviks executed the entire Romanov family.”

I’ve studied the Romanovs. Nicholas II was way out of his league, and he knew it: He did not want the crown, and, when his father died, lamented that it would fall to him. He despaired because he knew nothing of ruling.

The kids? Utterly sheltered and clueless as to the ways of the world outside the palace grounds (several palaces, by the way) and other royal getaways. The two eldest girls were the equivalent of candystripers during WWI, but that was about it. None of them had even the slightest inkling they were going to be murdered (though the eldest daughter, Olga, began to withdraw into herself near the end, as if she knew she was not long for the world, though I’m sure murder was the last thing she expected).


10 posted on 11/03/2016 5:06:53 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

One need not take the law seriously when there is enough influence and cash to buy it off.


11 posted on 11/03/2016 5:07:02 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Why aren't I fifty pints ahead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
“Deceptive” is a pretty squishy word...either it was perjury or it wasn't.

Not in the least. Deceptive is a perfectly fine word with a precise English definition. A thing is not moral simply because it is legal in some strict sense, nor is a thing necessarily immoral because it is illegal.

Even in the law there are grey shades: making a false statement, lying under oath, may (or may not be) a crime depending on the circumstances, and may still not be perjury.

Deceit has a specific legal meaning, which falls short of perjury, and which is not the least bit "squishy:" For legal purposes, deceit is a tort that occurs when a person makes a factual misrepresentation, knowing that it is false.

12 posted on 11/03/2016 5:11:45 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

“Run Forest . . . er, Hillary!”


13 posted on 11/03/2016 5:15:27 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna; Gay State Conservative

>>“Deceptive” is a pretty squishy word...either it was perjury or it wasn’t.

>Not in the least. Deceptive is a perfectly fine word with a precise English definition.

This is why the usual witness oath is about telling the truth, and the WHOLE truth.

A Clinton tells debatable truths, but almost never the whole truth, as shown by more than a generation’s worth of experience.


14 posted on 11/03/2016 5:17:27 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
She can still be in legal jeopardy in this case, because deceit is a tort, and Judicial Watch is not a bunch of DOJ lawyers.
15 posted on 11/03/2016 5:19:53 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

That would be nice!


16 posted on 11/03/2016 5:21:38 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

In the photo on the plane with George...look at the number of hand held devices to the left of Hillary


17 posted on 11/03/2016 5:22:51 PM PDT by Stayfree (FlushHillary.com says "NEVER HILLARY", "NEVER HILLARY", "NEVER HILLARY")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

18 posted on 11/03/2016 6:16:13 PM PDT by 4Liberty (DEMOCRATS- Exporting Jobs, Importing Votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

HILLARY LIED..... SO WHAT’S NEW?


19 posted on 11/03/2016 6:26:12 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Not a good comparison IMHO. The Bolsheviks murdered the Romanovs for one reason. They were afraid the white Russians were going to take over Ekaterinburg and free the royal family as a symbol to rally around against the Reds. Then they set up a far more despotic regime.


20 posted on 11/03/2016 7:30:41 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson