I like Joe but he seems to have gone to the Dick Morris school of predictions and speculation - what has he been correct on lately?
In an interview last week Friday, Joe reported that the laptops of Clinton's top aides, which were supposed to have been destroyed under the immunity deals, were not destroyed. Rogue agents refused to do so.
That has subsequently been confirmed this week. So, at least on this case, his info seems legit.
He reported about a week ago that the laptops had not been destroyed & he was correct. He also said Huma did not have an immunity agreement - I suspect that is true although most people speculate she had one. I’d put my money on Joe. He’s got deep sources in the FBI. There are agents who want to whistle blow & he has said he will provide them with legal counsel if they do. Joe is one of the good guys ... truly. IMO, if he says it, that’s what is going on. He also called Comey a “Dirty Cop” which is gutsy because it could jeopardize his legal practice - he first did it on a Judicial Watch panel - Tom Fitton about fell off his chair.
Joe diGenova (Radio Host on DCs WMAL): Clinton Laptops not destroyed! FBI agents refused to do it! (Audio)
http://newyorkcityguns.com/2016/10/joe-digenova-radio-host-on-dcs-wmal-clinton-laptops-not-destroyed-fbi-agents-refused-to-do-it-audio/
Per reports yesterday, in spite of orders the laptops of Cheryl Mills and Pagliano has not been destroyed. Confirmed on FOX.
Still, because I so very much want this article to be true, I take these articles with a healthy dose of skepticism.
That being said, I am less skeptical of this article because the author names his source. I do not even read the True Pundit articles.
Joe was the first to say that the FBI agents did not destroy the laptops as ordered to do. It turned out he was right. Joe has good sources within the FBI and DOJ.