Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MayflowerMadam

Criminal investigations don’t work that way. They are not wikileaks or congressmen. It is rare that cops “leak” information about an investigation - it prejudices the jury pool and generally ticks off the Judge.


186 posted on 11/06/2016 5:55:00 PM PST by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: volunbeer

“It is rare that cops “leak” information about an investigation - it prejudices the jury pool and generally ticks off the Judge.”

This is a rare and critical time for America. Maybe it’s time for some good guys to go rogue to save the country. So it ticks off the judge. BFD. The judges are mostly lib activists anyhow. If cops can disseminate crucial information that can perhaps change some Dems’ minds, then so be it.

“They” never play by the rules, they get away with it, and they’ve infiltrated every blessed facet of the government. Maybe it’s time we took a lesson from them.


203 posted on 11/06/2016 11:40:43 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Rev. Jeffress re Trump: "He may not be like us, but he likes us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: volunbeer
It is rare that cops “leak” information about an investigation - it prejudices the jury pool and generally ticks off the Judge.

But what we have learned in these last few decades is that when it comes to the Clintons, the case never gets to the judge or the jury.

And even when the judge and jury is the American voter, the facts are still being kept from us.

207 posted on 11/07/2016 8:12:43 AM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson