Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana
However, he did not directly say whether the judges would overturn Roe v. Wade.

uhhh.....because he can't read minds?


2 posted on 11/14/2016 9:09:17 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog

If the baby killers really believe the majority of voters are in favor of baby killing, they can get their state legislatures to permit it after Roe v. Wade is overturned. That’s the way it’s supposed to work under our constitutional system of Federalism.


8 posted on 11/14/2016 9:20:43 AM PST by henkster (Clinton delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Roe v. Wade is the example of “settled law” that shall last only until a party with standing can bring a suit before the reformed Supreme Court, and present the demand that the Justices review the wording of the Constitution, with an eye to whether the right to determine if abortion rights are to be found anywhere in the document, and rule accordingly.

“Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

In other words, kick it back to the states, so the STATE courts can rule on its constitutionality as it relates to STATE constitutions.

The argument should never have come before the US Supreme Court, or any Federal court.


10 posted on 11/14/2016 9:20:59 AM PST by alloysteel (Je suis deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Bellflower

ping


26 posted on 11/14/2016 5:26:22 PM PST by Bellflower (Dems = Mat 6:23 ....If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson