Impossible. That’s Romney’s position. /s
I think this proves the Commie media has absolutely NO idea what the heck they are talking about..first it was Guiliani, than Romney, now Petraeus..NO ONE KNOWS..when you hear it out of Trumps mouth then you know the truth otherwise its ALL BS
People jump to conclusions. I’d rather think Trump met with Willard to discuss Gen. Petraeus as S.O.S. Try THAT on for size.
About as likely as Willard. Rumor is now out of control.
I figure it’s only a matter of time before Trump gets around to interviewing a Feeper. I mean look at how many have been rumored to be in the running for the SecState gig? Maybe I should check my voicemail?
They are being considered. Possibly neither of them get the final pick. Trump is doing it so that he can say that he has an open mind on the matter.
OH NO.......!!!!!! WTF!
Better the General than the schmuck/loser from Michigan.
At this point it might be more efficient to list who is NOT in the running.. Also, for all this talk about the high value of loyalty, how is it that Rudy, who publicly announced thats what he wants and who was loyal to a fault, is now being embarrassed in public by someone who did everything possible to bring down the campaign ?