Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkinanloomin

And if they “shall be considered as natural born citizens” - does that not mean they have all the rights, privileges and responsibilities of a natural born citizen?

Just curious.


24 posted on 11/18/2016 12:54:35 PM PST by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: ro_dreaming

Moot point, that act was repealed and the replacement did not mention natural born citizen.
Congress cannot change the Constitution.


25 posted on 11/18/2016 12:56:05 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: ro_dreaming

Obviously not, or the legal minds would not be arguing to abolish the clause:

http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3528&context=cklawreview&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcongress%2Battempts%2Bto%2Bchange%2Bnatural%2Bborn%26form%3DAPMCS1#search=%22congress%20attempts%20change%20natural%20born%22

Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 81 Issue 1Symposium: Promises, Commitments, and the Foundations of Contract Law Article 12 December 2005

Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle
Sarah P. Herlihy

For decades they have been trying to globalize our President of the USA.


26 posted on 11/18/2016 1:17:31 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson