Your brand of mockery would be much more effective if you: a) actually attempted to answer the pertinent questions, b) didn’t fall into the trap of circular reasoning so consistently. ( the “signs of its passage” you’re referring to are ... ?)
“the “signs of its passage” you’re referring to are ... ?”
Hey, listen, when evolutionists can’t produce their missing links, we are just supposed to accept that fossilization is very rare and the record is incomplete.
When, creationists don’t find many signs of platypus migrating to Australia, then the record is complete enough to ridicule them for it.
It’s a totally consistent position, don’t you see? /sarc
There are always more questions than answers for evolution and science in generat. Such an attention getting headline is nonsense. And irritating. Only creationists have all the answers at the beginning? Then why spawn asinine articles like this. Just gobbledygook word games. Transitional is a defined use.
There are always more questions than answers for evolution and science in generat. Such an attention getting headline is nonsense. And irritating. Only creationists have all the answers at the beginning? Then why spawn asinine articles like this. Just gobbledygook word games. Transitional is a defined use.