Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper; appalachian_dweller; aragorn; Arthur Wildfire! March; ASA Vet; Art in Idaho; ...

PING!!!

Article and comments

From article:
Nearly every income bracket would see a reduction, save for the very bottom. People making around $12,280 in 2016 who have worked for 30 years would see an increase of around 20%. But young people making the same amount would be hit hard by the changes. If they had 14 years of work experience by 2016, they would see their benefits cut in half.

The plan would also cut entirely cost of living adjustments (COLA) for retirees earning above $85,000.

Thanks, SoFloFreeper


3 posted on 12/09/2016 5:12:28 PM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Whenifhow

All of this would be wrong. An reform that doesn’t privatize SS or eliminate it is wrong and unconstitutional as SS was from the beginning. I get SS as a major part of my income and would accept if all SS were simply ended tomorrow while understanding that it would be better to privatize it for anyone under, say, 50 y.o. and keep it as is for those past 50 when the change is made.


19 posted on 12/09/2016 5:59:43 PM PST by arthurus (Mrs Clinton is The Great Conniver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow
The plan would also cut entirely cost of living adjustments

They haven't paid a COLA in 8 years, of course cost of living hasn't went up either. </s>

27 posted on 12/09/2016 7:13:13 PM PST by itsahoot (Three words I don't want to hear, Comprehensive Immigration Reform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson