Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: volunbeer

I agree with you on wind turbines. Plus they are a visual blight on the landscape. As for CFLs, we have been using fluorescent tubes for as long as I can remember, so I would take issue with your landfill assessment. However, with the advent of the LED light bulb, the CFLs are going to go away very quickly because the LEDs last about five times as long as a CFL and they use a lot less energy. We’ve a large number of recessed lighting fixtures that use R30 and R40 lamps. Some time ago the government cut these bulbs output from 75 watts down to 65, with consequent lower levels of light being produced. We just changed all of them out for the new 75watt LEDs and now we are trying to get used to the improved illumination along with lamps that consume about 15 watts of electricity while they are giving us better lighting.
CFL’s were a bad idea because not only are they a pollution hazard, they give of light that’s hard on the eyes.


39 posted on 12/14/2016 12:43:26 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387

“Plus they are a visual blight on the landscape...”

Whose landscape are wind turbines blighting?


43 posted on 12/14/2016 12:45:57 PM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson