It would make it 7 points of forgery. And it would also show the slipshod nature of the investigations.
BTW five of the remaining points are also questionable.
Sorry, Zoltan, but you’ve tried too many idiot defenses of Obama on me in the past. Your credidibily with me is zero.
The reason I went to reddit and studied the reaction to Arpaio’s presser there is twofold. First, I don’t and have never claimed to be an expert in this area. Second, as I previously noted, a massive percentage of the posters on the thread I excerpted make their living writing code. (One of them, whose analysis I recently read, actually worked on the beta version of the copier that you Obots claim inserted the layers.) These are the techies among us; they know what they’re talking about.
Not one—not even ONE—raised any flags re Zullo & CO’s analysis. Indeed, in that entire discussion and several others, only one issue ever arose. Namely, a couple of different posters wondered if Obama’s could be the original, and Ah’Nee’s the copy.
So who am I going to believe, the techies who write code for a living, or an Obot who has proposed some insanely absurd explanations as to why there is no trace of Stanley Ann in HI in the mos leading up to the birth and for ~a year afterward?
Hint: not you. You shot the last vestiges of your credibility long ago.