“The important thing for the folks in these places to do is get the crèche away from your municipal building and put it in a park instead.”
That won’t satisfy them.
Alberta’s Child said:
“...The important thing for the folks in these places to do is get the crèche away from your municipal building and put it in a park instead....”
Carthego delenda est replied:
“That won’t satisfy them.”
__________+ + +__________
However, the lack of religious symbols in front of a government building during a time of seasonal devotions implies that the government sponsors atheism, one may surmise.
How would you know it won’t satisfy them. I cannot recall any argument of presentations on private property. Here in my area there churches/religious venues every block. Why doesn’t it satisfy you to have all these presentations. Why is there the need to also the local government also sponsor a presentation. I assume you would be comfortable with concurrent presentation honoring Zeus in the courthouse square? I am not happy if any presentation is done at taxpayer expense. If these are completely privately funded, as long as ANY presentation is allowed and rotated among requesters if there are conflicts on date requests, then I would be OK.
It's not about satisfying anyone. It's about protecting your own interests.